W dniu 25.04.2021 o 16:44, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 03:08:44 +0200, Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
Before APPLY - take care about SMPPTS1 DDDEFs in other zones.
Is it useful, or even safe, to define SMPPTS* in other than GLOBAL zone?
It is necessary.
Does SMP/E warn or prohibit
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 03:08:44 +0200, Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
>>
>>> Before APPLY - take care about SMPPTS1 DDDEFs in other zones.
>>>
>> Is it useful, or even safe, to define SMPPTS* in other than GLOBAL zone?
>
>It is necessary.
>
>> Does SMP/E warn or prohibit inconsistent SMPPTS* definitions
W dniu 24.04.2021 o 23:46, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 21:25:49 +0200, Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
Before APPLY - take care about SMPPTS1 DDDEFs in other zones.
Is it useful, or even safe, to define SMPPTS* in other than GLOBAL zone?
It is necessary.
Does SMP/E warn or
On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 21:25:49 +0200, Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
>Before APPLY - take care about SMPPTS1 DDDEFs in other zones.
>
Is it useful, or even safe, to define SMPPTS* in other than GLOBAL zone?
Does SMP/E warn or prohibit inconsistent SMPPTS* definitions among
zones?
(I remember Ed Gould
Before APPLY - take care about SMPPTS1 DDDEFs in other zones.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
(looking for new job)
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 23.04.2021 o 19:59, Bill Giannelli pisze:
Thank you for the replies!
Yes, SMPe "recovered" from the E37-04.
It spilled over to SMPPTS1 then in turn spilled over to
the SMPPTS datasets.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2021 12:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMPe receive e37-04 on SMPPTS1
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMPe receive e37-04 on SMPPTS1
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the
sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email,
which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.]
Classification
Good use of all those Mod -1s and -3s laying around!
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Carmen Vitullo
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2021 2:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMPe receive e37-04 on SMPPTS1
I will be long retired before I
I will be long retired before I get to the point I'll need 99 SMPPTS's :)
Carmen Vitullo
-Original Message-
From: David <00ac4b1d56b3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN
Date: Friday, 23 April 2021 1:36 PM CDT
Subject: Re: SMPe receive e37-04 on SMPPTS1
A
And you can have 99 SMPPTS spill datasets (SMPPTS1 to SMPPTS99), if memory
serves...
David
-Original Message-
From: Lizette Koehler
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Fri, Apr 23, 2021 2:14 pm
Subject: Re: SMPe receive e37-04 on SMPPTS1
As needed, I will create as many SMPPTSx datasets
Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2021 11:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMPe receive e37-04 on SMPPTS1
Thank you for the replies!
Yes, SMPe "recovered" from the E37-04.
It spilled over to SMPPTS1 then in turn spilled over to SMPPTS2.
s
Thank you for the replies!
Yes, SMPe "recovered" from the E37-04.
It spilled over to SMPPTS1 then in turn spilled over to SMPPTS2.
so it seems all good
thanks!
Bill
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
List On Behalf Of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2021 12:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SMPe receive e37-04 on SMPPTS1
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the
sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email
Do you have an SMPPTS2 dataset? If the SMPPTS1 dataset ran out of space during
the receive it either spilled over to SMPPTS2 or if it's a PDS. SMP/e
compressed it and continued the receive process to a successful completion.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG
I ran a SMPe receive and got a CC 0. Assuming all was ok I went on to the
Apply. When I looked back at the receive job I now noticed it got a E37-04 on
the SMPPTS1 dataset.
Now I am not sure all the PTFs were loaded into SMPPTS1.
Should I rerun the receive making sure I address the E37 issue?
15 matches
Mail list logo