Hi
All I wish to make a comment regarding bypassing IBM intentions
Yes I have worked for a few vendors
And durning that time I have worked
On products that
• replace the FLIH for PGM checks
• front ended SVC
• front ended the DB2 SQL engine
It's common practice for ISV to do
Non vanilla non
On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 08:03:19 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht
wrote:
>Walter Farrell wrote:
>
>>I really wish we knew what ISV he works for so everyone could avoid their
>>products, or perhaps contact their management and tell them he's a seriously
>>dangerous programmer.
>
>>And yes, I wish no one w
Walter Farrell wrote:
>I really wish we knew what ISV he works for so everyone could avoid their
>products, or perhaps contact their management and tell them he's a seriously
>dangerous programmer.
>And yes, I wish no one would give him hints about bypassing the integrity
>checks.
I agree wit
I really wish we knew what ISV he works for so everyone could avoid their
products, or perhaps contact their management and tell them he's a
seriously dangerous programmer.
And yes, I wish no one would give him hints about bypassing the integrity
checks.
Regards,
Walt
On Jul 7, 2014 6:36 PM, "Shm
In
,
on 07/06/2014
at 11:45 PM, MichealButz said:
>I am getting 306 ABEND because my APF concatenation contains a NON
>authorized Library.
No. It's not an authorized concatenation if one of the libraries is
unauthorized.
What are you trying to say? What does it have to do with SVC 99.
--
I wrote the recovery in case there was an error and figured to give the user
A second chance to enter the Dsn
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 7, 2014, at 8:28 AM, Paul Gilmartin
> <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 07:57:53 -0400, MichealButz wrote:
>>
On 7 July 2014 09:33, John McKown wrote:
> I really wish that I knew exactly what Michael hopes to accomplish.
I think we -- that is those of us still following to this point -- all do.
> As best as I recall, it was that he had an APF authorized TSO command,
> which was properly authorized. And
cKown"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Monday, July 7, 2014 7:25:38 AM
Subject: Re: SVC 99 APF Authorized Library
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 10:45 PM, MichealButz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am getting 306 ABEND because my APF concatenation contains a NON
> authorized Library. IS
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 08:33:29 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>
>I guess that would be possible. One "problem" is that the DEB does not
>have one entry per data set. It has one entry per extent per data set.
>It does not have any indication in the DEB entry relating back to a
>specific DSN. Just to an exte
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>>As I understand it, what happens is this:
>>
>>One: to run APF authorized basically means that the APF bit is set
>>"on" in the JSCB. When you (or the initiator in the case of
>>STEPLIB/JOBLIB)
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 07:25:38 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 10:45 PM, MichealButz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am getting 306 ABEND because my APF concatenation contains a NON
>> authorized Library. IS it possible to remedy this (as I have a recovery
>> routine)
>>
>> By Dynamic allocat
MichealButz wrote:
>The original AUTHPGM/CMD came from the TSOLIB I then did a load from steplib
>which had a non apf lb went to my recovery allocated a dsn got retddn that
>should work according to Walt
So, you want to do things to compromise system integrity? Why not remove the
non APF lib o
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 07:57:53 -0400, MichealButz wrote:
>The original AUTHPGM/CMD came from the TSOLIB I then did a load from steplib
>which had a non apf lb went to my recovery allocated a dsn got retddn that
>should work according to Walt
>
Why not simply remove the non-authorized data sets fro
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 10:45 PM, MichealButz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am getting 306 ABEND because my APF concatenation contains a NON
> authorized Library. IS it possible to remedy this (as I have a recovery
> routine)
>
> By Dynamic allocation of the dataset ?
_IF_ I understand what you want to do, t
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 7:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SVC 99 APF Authorized Library
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 05:50:23 -0500, Walt Farrell wrote:
>
>You should be able to use SVC99 to dynamically allocate an authorized library,
>OPEN a DCB that points to tha
Thanks that’s what I wanted to know
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Walt Farrell
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 6:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SVC 99 APF Authorized Library
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 02:50
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 05:50:23 -0500, Walt Farrell wrote:
>
>You should be able to use SVC99 to dynamically allocate an authorized library,
>OPEN a DCB that points to that DD, and then issue a LOAD _from that DCB_. That
>would avoid the 306 abend.
>
>However, while running authorized you cannot do a
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 02:50:11 -0400, Micheal Butz wrote:
>I am getting a 306-0C as i was trying to load from steplib when one of the
>libs in the concatenation was not authorized to remedy the situation in my
>recovery routine I intercept the abend and prompt the user for a valid library
>I then
reporting data bases for a fix for the problem. If no fix exists, contact
> the IBM Support Center. Provide the source input for the job.
>
> Source: Contents supervision (CSV)
>
> So which one was it?
>
> Lizette
>
>
>> -Original Message-
&g
Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Micheal Butz
> Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2014 11:31 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: SVC 99 APF Authorized Library
>
> The SVC 99 works I just keep on getting
The SVC 99 works I just keep on getting a 306 abend
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 7, 2014, at 2:25 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht
> wrote:
>
> MichealButz wrote:
>
>> I am getting 306 ABEND because my APF concatenation contains a NON
>> authorized Library.
>
> What is the reason code in register 1
MichealButz wrote:
>I am getting 306 ABEND because my APF concatenation contains a NON authorized
>Library.
What is the reason code in register 15? Please supply all CSV* messages you
received. What is your z/OS version?
>IS it possible to remedy this (as I have a recovery routine) By Dynam
The library that I use in the SVC 99 is authorized
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 7, 2014, at 12:44 AM, Paul Gilmartin
> <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 6 Jul 2014 23:45:27 -0400, MichealButz wrote:
>>
>> I am getting 306 ABEND because my APF concatenation c
On Sun, 6 Jul 2014 23:45:27 -0400, MichealButz wrote:
>
>I am getting 306 ABEND because my APF concatenation contains a NON
>authorized Library. IS it possible to remedy this (as I have a recovery
>routine)
>
>By Dynamic allocation of the dataset ?
>
I believe not. You can allocate dynamically, b
Hi,
I am getting 306 ABEND because my APF concatenation contains a NON
authorized Library. IS it possible to remedy this (as I have a recovery
routine)
By Dynamic allocation of the dataset ?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscrib
25 matches
Mail list logo
