-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2021 4:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: question on enqueues
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 22:19:56 +, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>Thanks, Dave, you poin
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2021 4:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: question on enqueues
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:43:30 +, Dave Barry wrote:
>If I'm not mistaken, FDR has an ENQ/NOENQ option. You decide which you can
>tolerate in your situation.
>
S
behalf of
Paul Gilmartin [000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2021 5:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: question on enqueues
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 22:19:56 +, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>Thanks, Dave, you pointed me in the ri
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 22:19:56 +, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>Thanks, Dave, you pointed me in the right direction although the FDR
>documentation makes it sound like it doesn't matter how the DSNENQ option is
>set. I found this little tidbit in the FDR manual:
>
>If a data set name appears in a DD s
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2021 2:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: question on enqueues
If I'm not mistaken, FDR has an ENQ/NOENQ option. You decide which you can
tolerate in your situation.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailt
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:43:30 +, Dave Barry wrote:
>If I'm not mistaken, FDR has an ENQ/NOENQ option. You decide which you can
>tolerate in your situation.
>
Some other utilities have alternative DSN|DD arguments. For DSN, the
utility performs the ENQ; for DD it assumes the caller's allocati
A.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: question on enqueues
CAUTION! This email originated outside of the organization. Please do not open
attachments or click links from an unknown or suspicious origin.
==
[Default] On 15 Feb 2021 15:
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Radoslaw Skorupka [r.skoru...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2021 9:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: question on enqueues
Few remarks:
1. DISP=SHR does not guarantee the SHR in effect. Actual ENQ can be
different. Test: SYSUT2 in IEBGENER step and DISP
]
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2021 6:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: question on enqueues
I have one that's puzzling me and I'm sure there's a simple solution/answer.
I'm seeing 2 jobs running on a single system that are hitting an enqueue
problem on a parmlib. The
Few remarks:
1. DISP=SHR does not guarantee the SHR in effect. Actual ENQ can be
different. Test: SYSUT2 in IEBGENER step and DISP=SHR - you will see
exclusive ENQ.
2. I don't know FDRflash, but tools using DASD Point in Time replication
features (Flashcopy, Snapshot, TimeFinder...) can work wi
[Default] On 15 Feb 2021 15:37:38 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
rpomm...@sfgmembers.com (Pommier, Rex) wrote:
>I have one that's puzzling me and I'm sure there's a simple solution/answer.
>I'm seeing 2 jobs running on a single system that are hitting an enqueue
>problem on a parmlib. The JCL
I have one that's puzzling me and I'm sure there's a simple solution/answer.
I'm seeing 2 jobs running on a single system that are hitting an enqueue
problem on a parmlib. The JCL in both jobs has DISP=SHR, yet one of the jobs
has an exclusive ENQ on the library. Here's the scenario:
Job A i
12 matches
Mail list logo
