That is about what I figured, Thanks.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Alan Altmark
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 2:00 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject:Re: CURRDATE/CURRTIME
On Fri
Not me. Oh no, I had to do it the hard way !
LOL
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 4:17 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: ZVM 5.2 Install Assistance
On Friday, 04/14/2006 at 0
On Friday, 04/14/2006 at 04:03 EST, Robert Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The big issue for me wasn't very big at all, the GATEWAY statement
> in the TCPIP configuration stuff was different in syntax and I had
> to read the docs a few times, then some trial and error changes.
While you do get
I kept reading and found out how to view the memo information. It
related to RACF and we will be using VM:Secure so I am moving on.
___
Jim Hughes
603-271-5586
"Impossible is just an opinion."
It worked for me but as always, YMMV.
The big issue for me wasn't very big at all, the GATEWAY statement
in the TCPIP configuration stuff was different in syntax and I had
to read the docs a few times, then some trial and error changes.
So far, all is well 24 x 7 and counting. With that said, ple
On Friday, 04/14/2006 at 01:21 MST, "Schuh, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> Do you want the time that CMS was IPLed?
> Yes
CMS doesn't keep that information around anywhere that I know of. When
PROFILE or SYSPROF is running you could set a GLOBALV variable or stuff
something into NUCUSE
Maybe I should declare victory and move on..?
___
Jim Hughes
603-271-5586
"Impossible is just an opinion."
=>-Original Message-
=>From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
=>Behalf Of Robert Payne
=>Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 4:57 PM
=>
I recently loaded zVM 5.2 to a second level machine and only
made a slight glance at the VMFVIEW information. RSU went
smooth and I implemented the new system last Friday. We have run
without a problem for the last week on zVM 5.2 on our z800.
Ho Ra for big blue !
:)
-Original Mess
I am loading ZVM 5.2 to our squeaky clean Z890.
The SERVICE procedure completed and the manual says to execute VMFVIEW
SERVICE. I did and this showed up. What do I do with it???
SERVICE USERID
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Alan Altmark
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 1:18 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject:Re: CURRDATE/CURRTIME
On Friday, 04/14/2006 at 12:25 MST, "Schuh, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Friday, 04/14/2006 at 12:25 MST, "Schuh, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Are the CURRDATE and CURRTIME fields of NUCON updated only when CMS is
ipled?
No. They are updated whenever you issue the TIME, STIMER, or STIMERM
macros. But they're simply in the format of diag 0x270, so you c
Richard,
CURRDATE and CURRTIME are updated during CMS IPL. Any STIMER
or STIMERM call will also update those fields.
Mike Donovan
"Schuh, Richard"
Are the CURRDATE and CURRTIME fields of NUCON updated only when CMS is ipled?
Regards,
Richard Schuh
On Friday, 04/14/2006 at 09:48 EST, Mike Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Having heard endless discussion from IBMers that the right way to talk
about
> the z9 is always "System z9", I find it interesting that there's
reference to
> "The IBM System z Webcast" leaving off reference to "z9".
There have been a number of good posts regarding the
needs of the entry-level, and smaller IBM customers wanting to use z/VM
solutions. It is important for IBM to hear from those businesses
(some of which everyone hopes will grow to need System z9's).
But before everyone comes down on IBM too ha
I will be out of the office starting 04/11/2006 and will not return until
04/19/2006.
I exepct to have limited email access however please contact Tom Murphy at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for any high severity, emergancy type needs. Thanks
and Best Regards,
If I'm correct. If your a New customer and dont have a IBM Os of any
flavor and would like to buy a entry level box then the Flex option is
out of the question as IBM no longer offers a 390 based Os that is
liscensed for a Flex based system..
Julian Wall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruce Nunn wro
Two last things. I admit that z890 or z900 hardware will scale better
without disrupting systems running on it, but I'd bet that most Flex
customers, like us, don't dream that they will ever need near what a
fully-cranked z890 can provide. Second, since IBM is staying firm on
what they will all
David Boyes wrote:
While I'd be inclined to agree with Alan for larger customers, I think
Ed has identified a valid point, especially for people who currently
have relatively small systems, such as Flex boxen or MP2000/MP3000
systems.
Amen.
What David said is what the CxOs see. As if his arg
19 matches
Mail list logo
