Re: Tape Modeset for 3480 XF

2006-06-10 Thread Imler, Steven J
With (most) IBM compatible 3480s/3490s ... yes. One exception I can think of is Memorex which have a setting which enables its own proprietary hardware compression that can not be read by any other vendor's tape drive. With IBM's 3590 drives ... only in one direction ... meaning that higher

Re: Help with verifying a PTF

2006-06-10 Thread Steve Gentry
Well, then Houston, I think we've got a problem because when I download UM31742, use SERVICE and PUT2PROD, it doesn't update correctly. When I review the various MSG and LOG files, it appears that it installs correctly. So . . . either the code is wrong or SERVICE and/or PUT2PROD has a problem.

follow-up Help with verifying a PTF

2006-06-10 Thread Steve Gentry
I installed PTF UM31742 manually and got the same results. i.e, the IOCP utility still says it is Rel./Ver. 1.2 Guess I'll call IBM on Monday. Steve G. Leland Lucius [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 06/09/2006 03:45 PM Please respond to The

Re: follow-up Help with verifying a PTF

2006-06-10 Thread Imler, Steven J
Steve, Whatever process you used ... verify that the *new* IOCP MODULE has been placed on the "S-Disk" ... and that you re-saved CMS after you moved it (and probably other components) to the S-Disk. JR (Steven) Imler CA Senior Software Engineer Tel: +1 703 708 3479 Fax: +1 703 708 3267

Re: follow-up Help with verifying a PTF

2006-06-10 Thread Steve Gentry
I have verified this. I have access to 2 VM 5.2 systems. I installed this fix using SERVICE and PUT2PROD on one VM. On the other, I did it the manual way. Further, there appears to be 6 modules involved. IOCP.MODULE ICPPCNTL.MODULE IOPPCNTL.MODULE IXPPCNTL.MODULE IZPPCNTL.MODULE IYPPCNTL.MODULE I

Re: follow-up Help with verifying a PTF

2006-06-10 Thread Steve Gentry
The z9 box is a(n) m/t 2096. What got this started is when I tried to 'compile' using the IOCP util. shipped version of 5.2, It didn't like the SYSTEM param of 2096. That plus some other things that are either unique to a 2096 or a ds8100. I got a bunch of errors. After installing UM31742, I'm

the IND LOAD command

2006-06-10 Thread Steve Gentry
On VM 4.3 when the IND LOAD was issued it returned, among pieces of info, the percentage (IIRC) of how much main memory was being used, i.e, Storage Utilization. The IND LOAD command in 5.2 does not provide this information anymore. Is this info provided by some other command or is it lost to

Re: the IND LOAD command

2006-06-10 Thread Richard Schuh
Steve Gentry wrote: On VM 4.3 when the IND LOAD was issued it returned, among pieces of info, the percentage (IIRC) of how much main memory was being used, i.e, Storage Utilization. The IND LOAD command in 5.2 does not provide this information anymore. Is this info provided by some other

Re: the IND LOAD command

2006-06-10 Thread Marty Zimelis
-Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Schuh Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2006 3:53 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: the IND LOAD command Steve Gentry wrote: On VM 4.3 when the IND LOAD was issued it returned,