Re: real ctc vs vctc on tcp/ip

2006-09-10 Thread Ron Greve
>try setting the adapter number on the LINK statements to be the same: = >Both 0s or both 1s >David > David We set them both to 1 as show below. We now get a configuration error DTCCTC059 (TCP/IP recognizes link adapter address is invalid.) We set them back to 0 and 1 and we can get the links

Re: Saving a backup copy of NSSs with no tape drive

2006-09-10 Thread Imler, Steven J
That's what "versions" are all about in V/Seg-Plus. A new version is ... well, when one "appears". That may not happen for weeks, months, or years! It sounds like V/Seg-Plus already does what you're saying it would be nice to have ... JR JR (Steven) Imler CA Senior Software Engineer Tel: +1 7

Re: real ctc vs vctc on tcp/ip

2006-09-10 Thread David Kreuter
Title: RE: [IBMVM] real ctc vs vctc on tcp/ip try setting the adapter number on the LINK statements to be the same: Both 0s or both 1s David -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Ron Greve Sent: Sun 9/10/2006 5:55 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject:

Re: Saving a backup copy of NSSs with no tape drive

2006-09-10 Thread Rob van der Heij
On 9/10/06, Imler, Steven J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As mentioned previously, CA V/Seg-Plus is configurable to keep as many previous versions as you want for potential restore ... I believe the default is 3 to accommodate Rob's suggested scenario, but again it's configurable. The idea to kee

Re: real ctc vs vctc on tcp/ip

2006-09-10 Thread Ron Greve
>could you post your DEVICE/LINK pair from PROFILE TCPIP? >David To simplify testing we set up a second tcp/ip in the second lpar and connected the two over a real ctc. We saw the same failures as we saw by using SLES in the second lpar. lpar one -- attach 448 tcpip 720 attach 449 tcpip

Re: real ctc vs vctc on tcp/ip

2006-09-10 Thread Ron Greve
> >could you post your DEVICE/LINK pair from PROFILE TCPIP? >David > > To simplify our testing (taking out any LINUX issues) we set up a second tcp/ip in lpar 3 that we connected to the stack in Lpar 1 Here are the device/links from the two lpars. ; lpar one tcp/ip device/link DEVICE CTCVDE

Re: real ctc vs vctc on tcp/ip

2006-09-10 Thread David Kreuter
Title: RE: [IBMVM] real ctc vs vctc on tcp/ip could you post your DEVICE/LINK pairĀ  from PROFILE TCPIP? David -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Ron Greve Sent: Sun 9/10/2006 4:29 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: [IBMVM] real ctc vs vctc on tc

real ctc vs vctc on tcp/ip

2006-09-10 Thread Ron Greve
We have a Z/VM 5.2 TCP/IP connected to a Linux SLES 9 stack via CTC. We tested the setup with VCTC links and get connected ok. (LINUX in same LPAR). We moved the SLES system to another LPAR (again under VM) and attached a pair of real CTC paths to the systems to replace the VCTC links. When we do

Re: Saving a backup copy of NSSs with no tape drive

2006-09-10 Thread Imler, Steven J
As mentioned previously, CA V/Seg-Plus is configurable to keep as many previous versions as you want for potential restore ... I believe the default is 3 to accommodate Rob's suggested scenario, but again it's configurable. JR JR (Steven) Imler CA Senior Software Engineer Tel: +1 703 708 3479 F

Re: GCCCMS for zVM

2006-09-10 Thread Dave Wade
--- Rick Troth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wonder: could you get it to call LE libraries > instead of OS libs? > > -- R; > Rick, I know its a long time since you asked the above, but looking at the original Dave Pitts compiler, I note he did originally provide a port to LE on MVS. I'll try