Has anyone mapped out the values to tape drives types returned by Q cuu
ID? Perhaps even listed which types are compatible with what sorts of
tapes? (Yes, Herndon, I'm looking in your direction.)
I'm trying to come up with a better way of handling tape drives at a DR
site, but I figure they
Nick, you might try using Kris Buelen's QDEVS exec. It uses the XASTOR
package off of the VM download page at IBM, and returns a lot of info on
the real devices attached to your VM system, including tape drives from
the old 3420 to the new 3590 drives.
DJ
Nick Laflamme wrote:
Has anyone
Nick,
I am in the last stages of planning our next DR, perform on 2/24. When I
first started, we sent out our requirements to IBM and they responded in
kind with the VM Directory for their floor system for our machine. In the
directory they have all of the hardware that we are contracted for with
On: Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 10:29:41AM -0500,Nick Laflamme Wrote:
} Has anyone mapped out the values to tape drives types returned by Q cuu
} ID? Perhaps even listed which types are compatible with what sorts of
} tapes? (Yes, Herndon, I'm looking in your direction.)
Nick,
Not sure if this will
Hi all,
If I install CA-Top Secret / VM and CA-Top Secret / VSE, what's the best way
to manage the overall security? I mean, can I do it from just CA-Top Secret
VM (one security database) and control all VSE machines (and maybe other VMs
as well) only by using CA-Top Secret under VM?
Does
Hi all,
If I install CA-Top Secret / VM and CA-Top Secret / VSE, what's the best way
to manage the overall security? I mean, can I do it from just CA-Top Secret
VM (one security database) and control all VSE machines (and maybe other VMs
as well) only by using CA-Top Secret under VM?
Does
Nick,
Of course VM:Tape can do this ... but you're obviously looking for a
stand-alone utility (which I've thought about making, but unfortunately
have not ... I almost started this a couple of weeks ago ... ).
The primary issues you face are needing to either be able to physically
ATTACH the
Small correction: even though I've been working a bit on QDEVS and friends,
the real author of QDEVS is Michael Tanzer. Honor to who deserves it.
--
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support
DEVTYPE might give you some of the information you are looking for. Do a
HELP DEVTYPE and you should find it.
Colleen M Brown
IBM z/VM and Related Products Development and Service
Nick Laflamme [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
02/20/2007
Loren Charnley, Jr. wrote:
Nick,
I am in the last stages of planning our next DR, perform on 2/24. When I
first started, we sent out our requirements to IBM and they responded in
kind with the VM Directory for their floor system for our machine. In the
directory they have all of the hardware
Colleen Brown wrote:
DEVTYPE might give you some of the information you are looking for.
Do a HELP DEVTYPE and you should find it.
At first glance, DEVTYPE works with virtual devices, not real devices.
That's not a flaw, but it's a weakness compared to Q cuu ID
I'm pretty sure Q cuu ID
I guess that I am very fortunate in that I only have 2 types of drives. When
we restore VM VSE systems we use one type of drive, when we restore data
we use another type drive. So far, knock on wood, we have been able to
communicate which set of drives to use at a particular time and all has gone
On: Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 12:00:44PM -0500,Nick Laflamme Wrote:
} If I call the tape hangers at a DR site, they shouldn't have to care
} what tape drive addresses I'm used to. It's a lot easier for all
} involved if I can I can say Hang IM0123 on B00, not, Hang IM0123 on
} the drive I know as
I was just browsing the session abstracts for the upcoming IBM zExpo in
Munich, Germany when I found this:
L04 Porting OpenSolaris to zSeries: A Long Way Home
(Dr. David Boyes, Sine Nomine Associates)
What was involved in getting Solaris running on zSeries? What does it
take to make a new
I thought that everyone did that. Certainly those of us who had to live
with 3380 A/B-04's do it or its DIRMAINT equivalent.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
- snip --
I run daily VMX backups (VMXBKP03 and VMXBKP01),
so I have the (fairly) current source available for
Did anyone see this article regarding Nationwide:
http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=196700327
The specific item I wonder about is:
The IFLs don't come cheap. They're listed at $95,000 each on IBM's Web
site. But hundreds of small servers didn't come cheaply
$95K was quoted in the FAQ (page 23)
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/z9bc/zsq02226_usen_02.pdf
Also the IFL is 37% faster then the IFL on the z/890 (this was for the
z9/bc box).
However, the IFL in the EC box is still $125K.
Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/20/2007 4:18 PM
Did anyone see this article regarding Nationwide:
http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=196700327
The specific item I wonder about is: The IFLs don't come
cheap. They're listed at $95,000 each on IBM's Web site. But
hundreds of small servers didn't come cheaply
18 matches
Mail list logo
