I certainly did not want to cause confusion - this is why I said " There is
actually more science..." I was passing on what we learned through trial,
error and then a phone call. And blast it, you are indeed correct Kris.
On a system with 11 IFLs and a 2 vcpu guest that we needed to cap at 25%,
Jim, I'd say your append can introduce confusion.
The vcpus still count for absolute shares. But, indeed, the number of real
CPUs come into account: the % written on the SET SHAER command is expressed
as a % of the whole system.
If you have 10 CPU's, a SET SHARE ABS 5% LIMITHARD means that a unip
Mike Walter wrote on 08/03/2007 10:49:58 AM:
>
> Ah, that's the easy part. Now... do you have a Business Sponsor, a
> registered Project, a Project Manager, a Project Plan, and a
> chargecode for the hardware, software, and billable time?
>
> Oh, wait... it's not a big company-sponsored project.
Hi there!
The last sessions needing chairs are the following:
Mon 11:00a 1100 9256 Migration Kit for Solaris OS to Linux
Ulrich Weigand
Mon 11:00a 1100 9200 An Introduction to Linux and Open Source
Jim Elliott
Wed 08:00a 800 9285 Real-time enhancements for
There is actually more science to this than one would imagine. We just went
through this and chatted with Bill Bitner on it to try and understand it
all. Here are the things to keep in mind for setting SHARE (besides what is
already written in the HELP):
For RELATIVE share, the amount should be
Gotta love the small company mindset.
Mike Walter wrote:
Oh, wait... it's not a big company-sponsored project. Never mind.
The desired goal can be reached quickly within the required time,
cheaply, with few people, and work well! ;-)
Mike Walter
*"David Boyes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>*
Sent b
Ah, that's the easy part. Now... do you have a Business Sponsor, a
registered Project, a Project Manager, a Project Plan, and a chargecode
for the hardware, software, and billable time?
Oh, wait... it's not a big company-sponsored project. Never mind.
The desired goal can be reached quickly
Yes - a perhaps less flagrant a violation would be a NODROP option to
tell it to not drop dialed devices when it does the reset. Another
possibility would be to have some type of special device definition that
would retain the connection across a reset, thus eliminating the need
for an option on th
I "think" that you would be introducing an architectural violation. I
am pretty sure that a real s/360 thru z9 ipl does a channel reset on all
channels (chpids).
Jim
Michael Coffin wrote:
Whoops, you are correct Richard. I mis-spoke. The PROFILE EXEC
actually attaches a real 3270 (I still h
1 laptop + 1 $25 USB camera + 1 wireless network + 1 copy of MS
NetMeeting or gnomeMeeting = webcast
I'll send a camera with Neale.
Now, if someone wants to coordinate, setup and run a webcast, I am all
for it! I just can't do it though - my basket is overflowing.
Thanks. Will let you know how it came out.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Romanowski, John (OFT)
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 12:44
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: First attempt at FCP not going so well...
This ma
Whoops, you are correct Richard. I mis-spoke. The PROFILE EXEC
actually attaches a real 3270 (I still have a couple of COAX connected
PC's with 3270 cards that I keep around for this) and doesn't use a
DIALed 3270.
Looking down the road to the day that I don't have the COAX connected
cards, it
>> A webcast is unfortunatly not be possible
> Technical or political barrier?
Neither: Logistical.
-- R;
Thanks for clearing this up, Jim, I appreciate it. I can certainly
appreciate the fact that as the z/VM and Linux Project lead, your plate
is full most of the time.
I will not be able to attend this SHARE (drat, work), but please
give my best to all the new Knights and Ladies and eat a pie
Since workloads vary thought the day it is very hard to say one way or the
other what is best. The rule of thumb of course to give the machine doing
the most productive work the highest share. It is also important to remember
that the busier your z/VM system the more important the sharing becomes.
Absolutely not. It was my decision plus considering there is a significant
cost involved and with the venue (a VM birthday party) the thought was that
pictures and a video or two would cover it. I honestly do not have the
bandwidth to put something like that together in a short amount of time.
I
If you are not sitting behind a corporate firewall, try connecting to
'ibmlink.advantis.com' (IP of 204.146.168.209). This assumes of course that you
still have a AT&T Global Network Services account and UserID.
Mark T. Regan, K8MTR
CTO1 USNR-Retired (1969-1991)
- Original Message
> Been a vury long time since I last did... TN3270 port 23,
204.146.168.209
ibmlink.advantis.com
I would hazard a guess that it's political in this case.sigh
David Boyes wrote:
A webcast is unfortunatly not be possible
Technical or political barrier?
--
DJ
V/Soft
> A webcast is unfortunatly not be possible
Technical or political barrier?
Hello Catherine,
Within the HINTS and TIPS for VSE/ESA 2.7 is the TIME command that will
adjust the time to just about anything you want.
I use the
TIME ZONE=VM
TIME
Syntax: TIME
[DATE=mm/dd/,CLOCK=hh/mm/ss][ZONE={EAST|WEST|zid}/hh/mm]
The TIME command allows you to display or alte
Been a vury long time since I last did... TN3270 port 23, 204.146.168.209
Gregg
"No plan survives execution"
Jim Bohnsack
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hoo hoo! Can we go to SCIDS, Dad? Can we, Can we? :)
Phil Smith III wrote:
Phil Tully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Summer Share always coincides with my family vacations.
So bring your family...I am!
...phsiii
--
Rich Smrcina
VM Assist, Inc.
Phone: 414-491-6001
Ans Service: 360-715-2467
Phil Smith III wrote:
Phil Tully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Summer Share always coincides with my family vacations.
So bring your family...I am!
...phsiii
I wonder if Mrs. Tully consults
http://www.share.org/Events/future_conf.cfm when scheduling the family
vacation?
(Next F
> Good ol' functional, reliable and stable 3270 IBMLink. Gotta love it!
:sarcasm.
And even more unusual: actually acknowledging the presence and business value
of VM and CMS to IBM in public -- and in front of a bunch of z/OS weenies, and
everybody. What will the z/OS people think? Somebody
Is there a non-VTAM way?
Stracka, James (GTI) wrote:
Via VM/VTAM APPLID=3DIBM0SM01
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim Bohnsack
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 8:15 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM saves the day..
A webcast is unfortunatly not be possible, but I believe there will be
cameras including video that we will share afterward.
Jim
On 8/2/07, Rich Greenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On: Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 03:07:11PM -0400,James Vincent Wrote:
>
> } And YOU are invited!
> }
> } The 35th birt
Phil Tully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Summer Share always coincides with my family vacations.
So bring your family...I am!
...phsiii
Via VM/VTAM APPLID=IBM0SM01
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim Bohnsack
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 8:15 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM saves the day... again...
It's been so long since I accessed IBMLink vi
It's been so long since I accessed IBMLink via green screen that I've
forgotten how to do it. Is it an IP address or name in the emulator
and if so, what is it? Something obvious such as IBMLINK.IBM.COM or ???
Jim
James Vincent wrote:
--=_Part_103774_1734.1186139869270
Content-Type:
Good ol' functional, reliable and stable 3270 IBMLink. Gotta love it!
Signed,
Mr. Legacy
On 8/3/07, David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> From IBM-MAIN:
>
>
> Date:Thu, 2 Aug 2007 18:11:15 -0700
> From:Edward Jaffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: IBMLink "Official" VM ServiceLink A
>From IBM-MAIN:
Date:Thu, 2 Aug 2007 18:11:15 -0700
From:Edward Jaffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IBMLink "Official" VM ServiceLink Availability Notice
The following notice now appears when using 3270 IBMLink
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* *
32 matches
Mail list logo
