Re: dirm needpass no

2007-11-12 Thread Phil Smith III
A. Harry Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, he's talking about GLOBALV SELECT DVH15 SET NEEDPASS NO OK, I must have misunderstood part of the thread then. This is the setting I was referring to which, as your post goes on to note, doesn't work if done SOLELY on the client, because the

Re: dirm needpass no

2007-11-12 Thread Stephen Buckles
Won't DIRMAINT BATCH do what you want fairly easily? Using XEDIT, create a file of DIRM FOR NEEDPASS NO commands for those users with this requirement (or nicety) and execute a DIRM BATCH fn ft fm command from MAINT. Ron Schmiedge [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating

Re: dirm needpass no

2007-11-12 Thread Alan Altmark
On Monday, 11/12/2007 at 08:19 EST, Phil Smith III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A. Harry Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, he's talking about GLOBALV SELECT DVH15 SET NEEDPASS NO OK, I must have misunderstood part of the thread then. This is the setting I was referring to which, as your

Re: Controlling MONWRITE and the size of its 191 disk

2007-11-12 Thread Roger Lunsford
Rob, no apology necessary and I hope I did not come across as wanting to start or play in a 'mine vs yours' game or make readers think that. While it is true that the history data files do not contain the same detail as raw mondata, they are worthwhile to review and investigate if one is not

tcpip trace

2007-11-12 Thread Westlund, Mats (Mainframe servers)
If I run a trace with PACKETTRACESIZE and TRACEONLY device I get trace data but can't get any data when trying PACKETTRACESIZE and TRACEONLY ipaddress. Do anyone know if the TRACEONLY ipaddress statement is valid with PACKETTRACESIZE on a z/VM 5.2 system. Regards Mats Westlund

Dirmsat fails to execute commands for Dirmaint

2007-11-12 Thread RPN01
IBMLink appears to be down, so I¹ll throw this out here and hope to find an expert... I have Dirmaint defined on system ³A², and Dirmsat defined on system ³B². I have the definitions in config datadvh to define the relationship, and the virtual machines are up and running. I issue a Dirmaint

Re: tcpip trace

2007-11-12 Thread Alan Altmark
On Monday, 11/12/2007 at 11:30 EST, Westlund, Mats (Mainframe servers) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do anyone know if the TRACEONLY ipaddress statement is valid with PACKETTRACESIZE on a z/VM 5.2 system. No, it does not; you must use a device name. We updated with z/VM 5.3 pubs with this

Re: Dirmsat fails to execute commands for Dirmaint

2007-11-12 Thread Huegel, Thomas
I am by no means an expert, but I do seem to remember that happening to me once. I seem to remember the problem being something really simple. Something as simple as the class on the reader.. I wish I could be more helpfull. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System

Oracle Introduces Oracle VM As It Leaps Into Virtualization

2007-11-12 Thread Anne Lynn Wheeler
for something a little different ... also posted here http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007s.html#26 latest in the new, 40+ yr old technology Oracle Introduces Oracle VM As It Leaps Into Virtualization http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=202805289 couple items from