Lionel B. Dyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For those using or interested in using IBM's Operations Manager for z/VM I
have created a Google Group for mutual support and self-help. This is an
experiment to see if this group will be useful - if not it can easily be
ignored or deleted.
Apologies if
In case anybody wanted a link to the new Principles of Operation (-06).
--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology
The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged
and/or
Apologies if this has already been hashed out in the non-Digest stream,
but: why create a new list? Why not discuss it here?
...phsiii
The only reason is that you can post files in that forum and it is a
focused place for them. Not to detract from this listserv - it was just a
thought to
The powers that be blocked that site.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lionel B. Dyck
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 9:55 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: New Forum Available for
Dear colleagues:
I am entirely in favor of whatever model best addresses the need to
support ongoing useful discussion, either in this forum or any other
venue. As members of the VM community, we are all ultimately dining at
the same table.
The list configuration for IBMVM is set to
Question for those of you using PPRC. We're about to jump in.
Do you need to keep offline in system config the secondaries? And have
2 system configs in case you need to run off the secondaries?
Marcy Cortes
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not
Marcy,
I have an exec which runs in AUTOLOG1 at IPL, plus every half-hour (in case
something changes while you're running), to vary off all but my primary
DASD volumes. Looks like:
VM_DASD_addrs = '1000-10FF 1100-11FF 1910-1917'
'PIPE(name DASDOFF endchar ?)|',
'CP Q DASD ALL |',
'SPLIT ,
I'll bow to the group and will remove the forum and focus the
questions/etc to this listserv.
thx and sorry for the bother
Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist
Enterprise Platform Services, Mainframe Engineering
KP-IT Enterprise Engineering
925-926-5332 (8-473-5332) | E-Mail: [EMAIL
We use z/OS HCD to define our I/O configuration. The secondary volumes are
offline there. When in a D/R situation, we re-cable the secondary into the
primary CHPIDs and re-IPL (small shop).
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marcy
Twice in the last 4 weeks, we've had a problem on a random CHPID (bad
GBIC or something like that), that generated hundreds (thousands) of:
HCPERP602I DASD DE3E AN INTERFACE CONTROL CHECK OCCURRED
HCPERP6303I SENSE = INVALID
HCPERP6304I IRB = 04C24017
We have primary and secondary both online, since ages... The HW protects
you for mistakes: you cannot write to/read from the secondaries.
2008/2/27, Judson West [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We use z/OS HCD to define our I/O configuration. The secondary volumes are
offline there. When in a D/R
Kris wrote:
We have primary and secondary both online, since ages... The HW
protects you for mistakes: you cannot write to/read from the
secondaries.
Cool! Just what I hoped would happen. Thanks Kris!
Marcy Cortes
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
Well... my z/OS folks have had issues managing devices when the secondaries
are inadvertantly online to VM. Dunno the details.
Mark Wheeler, 3M Company
Marcy Cortes
Greetings,
FYI, I opened a PMR regarding the issue of directory entry shuffling
that was happening to me. Some responses from IBM:
quote
Well this behavior is built into DirMaint. DirMaint has to sort entries
is some order mostly based upon CP rules. DirMaint tries to associate
LINK and
Because.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marcy Cortes
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 9:39 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Interface control checks
Twice in the last 4 weeks,
To finish Richard's sentence; Because...
... that's what PROP, VM:Operator, and the IBM named version of
VM:Operator (sorry, don't remember the product name) are for.
Some customers may not want even a redundant CHPID brought offline because
experience has taught them that flaky CHPIDs will
We run something similar, but only in AUTOLOG1 or by special request. We
look through the complete list of DASD addresses, looking for CP Owned and
CP System devices. Anything that doesn't match either of these, and isn't
already offline, is varied offline. Counts are produced at the end.
With a
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 02/27/2008
12:44:15 PM:
Well... my z/OS folks have had issues managing devices when the
secondaries
are inadvertantly online to VM. Dunno the details.
Mark Wheeler, 3M Company
I checked with aforementioned z/OS folks... If the
18 matches
Mail list logo
