Re: VM source code

2008-03-03 Thread Kris Buelens
I think there is an error in the installation instructions: Step (2) De-Compaction of Envelope(s) substep (b) Using the DETERSE MODULE substep (c) Check the Envelope Substep (c) requests to check the envelopes to be F 1024. That seems wrong: in substep (b), the envelopes were untersed into a

Re: Service level after RSU

2008-03-03 Thread Jan Canavan
So should we all do this? We id this back in when the RSU 0703 first came out. We checked it three times. We just thought that was just the way it was. If more than one is having trouble, something is out of sync. -Original Message- >From: Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Mar 3,

Re: VM source code

2008-03-03 Thread Raymond Noal
Leland, Dave is correct. You can download the 'Restricted and PL/X Source' files once you are licensed for z/VM. The restricted source is a no-charge option which can be ordered with your z/VM system or downloaded afterwards. To review the download and install instructions for the restricted so

Re: VM source code

2008-03-03 Thread Mike Walter
Logon to MAINT. If you have not modified the PPF files, enter: VMSETUP ZVM component_name For example: VMFSETUP ZVM CP ... or... VMFSETUP ZVM CMS etc... Almost all VM source code is distributed, except code to support proprietary hardware, and some code that was written in the "dark ages"

Re: VM source code

2008-03-03 Thread Dave Jones
Leland, I believe you now need to explicitly ask IBM for access to the source code. Once IBM verifies that you hold a valid license , they send you the url of a secure web site (with a user id and password) that you can access and download the source. Hope this helps. Leland wrote: Is the so

VM source code

2008-03-03 Thread Leland
Is the source code no longer distributed? If I'm remembering correctly, most of the source distributed with at least 4.3.0 or 4.4.0? Just got a moistened whistle while at SHARE and wanted to do a bit of casual reading. :-) Leland

Re: Service level after RSU

2008-03-03 Thread Jim Bohnsack
I just put on RSU703 last week and at some point (don't remember--the memory is said to be the 2nd thing to go), I had a new CPLOAD MODULE and MAP on the MAINT 493 disk and the CPLOAD MODULE on the 2nd PARM disk. I used the black box SERVICE exec and then PUT2PROD. I think the above was the c

Service level after RSU

2008-03-03 Thread Stephen Frazier
You didn't move the new CPMODULE to the PARM disk you loaded from. The CPMODULE was generated on September 18, 2007. As you claim to have recently installed RSU0703 you either didn't generate a new CPMODULE or you didn't move it to your PARM disk or you IPLed from an old PARM disk. Shimon Lebow

Re: Service level after RSU

2008-03-03 Thread Alan Altmark
The easiest thing to do is to open a PMR. You will be granted audience with an Absolute Master of the Arcane. He or she will use their Power to divine the cause of your confusion. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott

Re: error bringing up cloned system

2008-03-03 Thread ken . schweiker
Back in business. Thanks to everyone for the answers. I used by-path for the boot partition. For the LVL the suse default was NOT uuid. I changed that to use uuid. I created another userid and successfully cloned the image. By the way I missed the part about needing 500 meg to install this(used NFS

Re: error bringing up cloned system

2008-03-03 Thread Mark Post
>>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 8:57 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, RPN01 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You know the by-path name before you ever create the Linux image. It will > always be /dev/disk/by-path/ccw-0.0.CCUU.part1 (for SuSE SLES 10), where > CCUU is the virtual address of the minidisk

Re: {SPAM?} Service level after RSU

2008-03-03 Thread Stracka, James (GTI)
It looks like two problems. 1. The current CPLOAD MODULE was not put on the PARM disk. 2. The CMS NSS was not saved from the 490 disk. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shimon Lebowitz Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2008 6:36 AM To

Re: SFSTAR Package

2008-03-03 Thread Kris Buelens
Normally, one would issue HELP ROUTINE DMSWRDBK (ERROR and/or HELP ROUTINES REASCODE to find 90307. I did, and it is not listed So I scanned all DMS* HELPREAS to find: DMSOPDBK - HELPROUT - Z1 ERROR! 90307 ! lrecl must not be negative. (also for DMSOPEN, DMSCLDBK, and DMSCRFIL) Time

Re: Service level after RSU

2008-03-03 Thread Shimon Lebowitz
Not installed yet, its a fresh system. Thanks, Shimon > Hi Shimon ... > > V/Seg isn't getting in your way ... is it? > > JR > > JR (Steven) Imler > CA > Senior Software Engineer > Tel: +1 703 708 3479 > Fax: +1 703 708 3267 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: Service level after RSU

2008-03-03 Thread Shimon Lebowitz
> Hello Shimon, > > If you IPL from the 490 disk do you get a CMS level at 703? > > Ed Martin CP I 190 CL Z/VM V5.3.02008-02-14 16:58 CP I 490 CL Z/VM V5.3.02008-02-14 16:58 Q CMSLEVEL CMS LEVEL 23, SERVICE LEVEL 702 READY; T=0.01/0.01 16:22:20 I guess not. :-( I see that 190

Re: {SPAM?} Re: Service level after RSU

2008-03-03 Thread Imler, Steven J
Hi Shimon ... V/Seg isn't getting in your way ... is it? JR JR (Steven) Imler CA Senior Software Engineer Tel: +1 703 708 3479 Fax: +1 703 708 3267 [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris B

Re: {SPAM?} Re: Service level after RSU

2008-03-03 Thread Edward M. Martin
Hello Shimon, If you IPL from the 490 disk do you get a CMS level at 703? Ed Martin 330-588-4723 ext 40441 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris Buelens Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 7:13 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: {SPAM?} Re: Se

Re: SFSTAR Package

2008-03-03 Thread Brian Ferguson
Well, It seems to packup the files, at least it does not give an error and creates what appers to be a file containing the files I want to move. But when I attempt to load them, I get this: ** sfstar load dadnn2a:ferguson.aaa.test

Re: error bringing up cloned system

2008-03-03 Thread RPN01
But, if you're cloning an image, and you're running beneath z/VM, then why would you ever need to change the CUU of any of the cloned disks? Generate your clone to match your master image, using the same virtual devices. Since one doesn't know about the other, from the guest standpoint, there is no

Re: error bringing up cloned system

2008-03-03 Thread RPN01
You know the by-path name before you ever create the Linux image. It will always be /dev/disk/by-path/ccw-0.0.CCUU.part1 (for SuSE SLES 10), where CCUU is the virtual address of the minidisk, if you're running as a z/VM guest, or the real CCUU of the device if you're running in an LPAR. (This also

Re: Moving Minidisks

2008-03-03 Thread Demeritt, Yvonne
Hi Richard, No, you can't do any management activities for a user on HOLD until you have reactivated it. When a user is on HOLD, it is not contained in the object directory and, for all intents and purposes, does not exist while on HOLD. Reactivating the user puts it back in place in the object

Re: {SPAM?} Re: Service level after RSU

2008-03-03 Thread Kris Buelens
I never used PUT2PROD, nor SERVICE,... But, issue a VMFSETUP ZVM CP and then look for the CPLOAD MODULE. Compare its date with what you see on MAINT CF1 (the disk you are supposed to IPL from). PUT2PROD should have placed the CPLOAD MODULE there. (a check for CMS is less easy) 2008/3/3, Shimon L

{SPAM?} Re: Service level after RSU

2008-03-03 Thread Shimon Lebowitz
Nope, the magic did not work: put2prod all VMFP2P2760I PUT2PROD PROCESSING STARTED VMFP2P1217I THERE ARE NO PRODUCTS TO PUT INTO PRODUCTION. VMFP2P2760I PUT2PROD PROCESSING COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY READY; T=0.71/0.75 12:54:25 > Believe it or not I think if you run PUT2PROD ALL, somehow magically