Greetings VMers!
We are Linux SLES9 to provide SSL telnet connections and the session limit is
100.
What do I need to do to raise that limit? This is under zVM 5.3.
Thanks.
Suleiman Shahin
_
Need to know the score, the
See the section on configuring the SSL server in the TCPIP Planning and
Configuration manual. You need to update the MAXSESS parm in the
DTCPARMS file for that userid and restart.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Thanks.
Suleiman Shahin
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 13:44:50 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Limit of Telent sesssions for SLEs9
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
See the section on configuring the SSL
server in the TCPIP Planning and Configuration manual. You need to update
With SFS' native security this is impossible, only the filespace owner and
an SFS admin can create subdirectories. I guess an ESM may change that.
In the past we had a PROP action routine that permitted users with write
access to a dirid to create new subdirs (and the PROP user was SFS admin).
Filepool administrator.
Usage note 4 under HELP CREATE says,
4. You cannot create a directory in another user's directory
structure.
Only the owner of the filespace and administrators may create
directories in a given
I was going to ask what I was doing wrong... But I figured that out just a
moment ago.
My question now is what is the logic behind requiring a user to be in
TCPIP¹s Obey list to allow it to use certain TCP/IP ports and protocols. It
isn¹t everything, because things like FTP work, and I think you
I am not an expert, but from what little I know, the lower ports
(1024) were considered to be privileged. The convention was that if
the originating port was 1024, then the remote end could __assume__
that the originator was authorized in some special way. And so, by
convention, the lower ports
That is part of the UDP design. If an error occurs the data is silently
discarded.
RPN01 wrote:
I was going to ask what I was doing wrong... But I figured that out just
a moment ago.
My question now is what is the logic behind requiring a user to be in
TCPIP’s Obey list to allow it to use
But my port wasn¹t specified; I was trying to talk to port 514 on the
destination. If what you¹re implying was true, then only OBEY users could
use FTP, since it¹s port number is 21.
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OE-5-55 200 First Street SW/V\
I'd buy that, except that it wasn't a protocol error; the problem was
entirely inside z/VM and TCPIP, in that a parameter was missing in the
PROFILE TCPIP, which isn't part of any of the standards. If I put my UDP
message out on the wire and it gets lost, I'll accept that. But if my own
interface
My point exactly.
On 3/7/08 3:12 PM, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An ftp client talks to an ftp server. The ftp server (an authorized
user) listens on port 21 (control connection). The ftp client uses an
ephemeral port (high port) to connect to the ftp server (on port 21).
The ftp
We are cutting up a bunch of old bus and tag cables that have been under the
machine room floor in order to pull them out a little more easily.
The blue ones don't seem to be made of copper. Lots of plastic and a little
aluminum.
When others have dumped their old bus and tag cables, what
We have a fairly straight-forward VMFTP macro that copies files from an
SFS subdirectory into a MVS PDS, each filename becoming the member name.
The return code from the put seems very odd. The return codes we observe
from successful puts are as follows:
* If the byte count is greater than
Since aluminum and copper have gone up in value in the last few years
(due to increased demand by developing economies), I would think that
any scrape metal dealer would jump at the chance to take these cables
off of your hands
Tom Duerbusch wrote:
We are cutting up a bunch of old bus
Take them to HP or Dell and tell them that they were used to hook
devices to your PC :-)
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Duerbusch
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 1:25 PM
To:
This is possible with SateSoftware's SAFESFS product. It saves a lot of
time in setting up SFS authorizations, and is well worth the nominal cost.
With SFS' native security this is impossible, only the filespace owner
and an SFS admin can create subdirectories. I guess an ESM may change
that.
We use bus and tag cables to hook our printer and tape drives to our
FLEX-ES box which is a PC, an IBM X-232. So your statement could be
ture.
/Fran Hensler at Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania USA for 44 years
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1.724.738.2153
Yes, Virginia,
My question now is what is the logic behind requiring a user to be in
TCPIP¹s Obey list to allow it to use certain TCP/IP ports and protocols. It
isn¹t everything, because things like FTP work, and I think you can play
fairly fast and loose with higher numbered ports.
Port number 1024 are
My point exactly.
FTPSERVE is listed as an authorized virtual machine in the PORTS list in the
TCPIP PROFILE. This permits it to listen on a low port.
The FTP client does not use a low source port, so is not subject to the
restriction.
Also: If I violate this using Pipe and the UDP stage, why don¹t I get a
non-zero return code?
Because there are no guarantees in the IP protocol specifications that UDP
packets are ever delivered. UDP was designed to have those semantics, and
thus if you use UDP, you're expected to
Richard, Mark Wheeler posted a fix to VMFTP for this problem several year
s
ago. Here is the link to the fix for VMFTP:
http://listserv.uark.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0007L=vmesa-l;
P=R7638
Or even better, go to Fran Hensler's download page and download VMFTPUPD
VMARC which has this fix and
On Friday, 03/07/2008 at 01:35 EST, Suleiman Shahin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings VMers!
We are Linux SLES9 to provide SSL telnet connections and the session
limit is
100.
What do I need to do to raise that limit? This is under zVM 5.3.
Before you do anything else, open a PMR with
On Friday, 03/07/2008 at 04:33 EST, Tony Thigpen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The shop I used to work at is having some TCP/IP problems with specific
terminals. Today, they noticed that some terminals show up in the
NETSTAT GATE query.
VM TCP/IP Netstat Level 430
(ahem)
10.22.70.15
Hi listers,
I like to use the shared file system in cms instead of the standard
minidisks. Now I have a problem with the file locking and I want to ask
you if this might be only a configuration or a real software bug. I have
first created a file on SFS and afterwards re-edited it to lock the
24 matches
Mail list logo
