Re: Unexpected FORCE starts

2008-03-29 Thread Kris Buelens
>the operator didn't wait for the shutdown to finish before doing the IPL. Then one would use SHUTDOWN REIPL Note too that CP writes shutdown progress messages to its consoles; on the HMC you can find them under Operating System Messages 2008/3/30, O'Brien, Dennis L : > We've occasionally had to

Unexpected FORCE starts

2008-03-29 Thread O'Brien, Dennis L
We've occasionally had to FORCE start a system after a planned shutdown, and we can't find any reason why the shutdown wouldn't have completed successfully. We're thinking maybe the operator didn't wait for the shutdown to finish before doing the IPL. We recently changed from 3174 console control

Re: DR refresh of active SFS

2008-03-29 Thread O'Brien, Dennis L
Marcy, FILESERV GENERATE does a CMS FORMAT of all the server minidisks, one at a time. If you want to speed it up, you could do the FILESERV GENERATE with a minimum number of minidisks in your POOLDEF file. While that's running, run several VM:Batch jobs in parallel to CMS FORMAT and RESERVE all

Re: DR refresh of active SFS

2008-03-29 Thread Marcy Cortes
>Part of a DR procedure is running an exec that regenerates all SFS servers How long does yours take? Takes an annoyingly long time - nearly an hour - to regenerate an 90G filepool. If we didn't do disaster tests monthly, it wouldn't be so bad, but what the heck could it be doing for an hour?! (z

Re: DR refresh of active SFS

2008-03-29 Thread Rich Greenberg
On: Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 12:57:26PM -0400,Jim Bohnsack Wrote: } A point about VMBACKUP, however, is that while we don't use it for DR, } we do use it. One day I was looking thru the VMBACKUP logs of what got } dumped and to my surprise, found that the VMBACKUP 1B0 disk, the } catalog, doesn't

Re: DR refresh of active SFS

2008-03-29 Thread Jim Bohnsack
A point about VMBACKUP, however, is that while we don't use it for DR, we do use it. One day I was looking thru the VMBACKUP logs of what got dumped and to my surprise, found that the VMBACKUP 1B0 disk, the catalog, doesn't get dumped by VMBACKUP. I always knew that it would be kind of a fuzz

Re: DR refresh of active SFS

2008-03-29 Thread Alan Altmark
On Friday, 03/28/2008 at 11:05 EDT, Colin Allinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What has happened is that most SFS servers start OK but the most active one > just dumps on startup. > > Is there any way to do a verification/clean process so that I can get it > started with whatever is valid -

Re: DR refresh of active SFS

2008-03-29 Thread Colin Allinson
Thanks for all the feedback on this. I was sort of hoping that the server might do some sort of integrity check on startup and tell me that there are 'n' corrupt files giving me the option of starting up without them - sort of like spool does. Unfortunately, from the feedback, it appears there

Re: DR refresh of active SFS

2008-03-29 Thread Kris Buelens
One of our RxServer based serves uses DDR to take a daily backup of key minidisks listed in a control file and count for the remainder on the weekly & daily incremental backups taken with VMBACKUP. SFS thus on VMBACKUP, nothing of SFS is on the DDR backup; the DDR must fit on a single casette (as