On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:51 AM, Thomas Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to thank Rob for pointing out the new STRUCTURE capabilities in the
latest runtime version of Pipelines. His presentation shows enough to get me
started on more intensive processing of z/VM's accounting data.
:-)
Hi,
I was told to inquire if SAFESFS is still the only
known ESM for SFS?
Thanks,
Shimon (loves bureaucrats)
--
Shimon Lebowitzmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
VM System Programmer .
Israel Police
RACF can also play the ESM role for SFS.
2008/5/22 Shimon Lebowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I was told to inquire if SAFESFS is still the only
known ESM for SFS?
Thanks,
Shimon (loves bureaucrats)
--
Shimon
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Kris Buelens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RACF can also play the ESM role for SFS.
As can VM:Secure
On Thu, 22 May 2008 08:39:04 +0200 Rob van der Heij said:
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:51 AM, Thomas Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to thank Rob for pointing out the new STRUCTURE capabilities in the
latest runtime version of Pipelines. His presentation shows enough to get me
started on
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:42 PM, A. Harry Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd read the ADATA output of the Assembler instead of source. That's its
there for, and it's a lot easier. You don't need to write your own assembler.
That's certainly an idea now that HLASM is fixed to work again
If you have marked devices as NOTACCEPTED in SYSTEM CONFIG, you can use
the CP SET DEVICES ACCEPTED rdev1-rdevn once z/VM is up and running.
Rick Barlow
Sr. z/VM Systems Programmer
Nationwide Services Co., Technology Solutions,
z/VM and System z Linux
The Linux ETR support only applies to Linux running in an LPAR. Getting
this to work for Linuxrunning in virtual machines will require VM to
accept and virtualize the new ETR signals.
Rick Barlow
Sr. z/VM Systems Programmer
Nationwide Services Co.,
On Wed, 21 May 2008 19:30:10 -0400, Alan Altmark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wednesday, 05/21/2008 at 07:25 EDT, dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
To recap:
1) VM (actually, CP) does not participate in the new SNT,
once CP has it's hardware TOD clock set from either the HMC
or the Operator,
On Thu, 22 May 2008 08:39:04 +0200, Rob van der Heij [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:-) Yes, this is fascinating stuff.
Too bad you missed the presentation. I suppose it was only in the
words with the pictures where I mentioned the need for something to
map DSECTs into CMS Pipelines structures
Code page 924 gives the following result (text-only viewers may not
display correctly):
---
| | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F | |
---
| 4 | â ä à á ã å ç ñ Ý . ( + | | 4 |
| 5 | é ê ë è í î ï ì ß
At IPL there are no RDEV's built for not accepted devices. In addition
to SET DEVICE ACCEPTED it's necessary to issue SET RDEVICE to build the
RDEV in order to be able to vary on the device.
No, VM:Secure is not an ESM for SFS. It can manage SFS enrollment, but
that's all.
Dennis O'Brien
Don't worry about biting off more than you can chew. Your mouth is
bigger than you think. -- CVW-11 chaplain, Carrier
-Original
The third quarter meeting of the Chicago Area VM (and Linux)
Enthusiasts will be held on Thursday, June 19, 2008.
The Final Agenda is included below.
--
Meeting Location:
*** NEW MEETING LOCATION ***
This quarter's meeting will be held at the Hewitt Associates 'East
Campus'
No, VM:Secure is not an ESM for SFS. It can manage SFS
enrollment, but that's all.
ACF2 and RACF provide ESM support for SFS.
Jim
FYI, with VM5.3, a 2007 back-level DIRECTXA MODULE on MAINT D-disk
(51D), is found and used before the serviced DIRECTXA MODULE S2.
IBM's VM5.3 file VMSYS:MAINT.CPDV.OBJECT MINIDISK MAP lists DIRECTXA
MODULE as part of the shipped contents of MAINT's 51D (D-disk).
You could be bit by that on
What is your date/time stamp? Mine is:
DIRECTXA MODULE D2 V 65535 4 24 4/15/07
12:58:14
DIRECTXA MODULE S2 V 65535 4 24 4/15/07
12:58:14
Thank you,
Scott R Wandschneider
Senior Systems Programmer
Infocrossing
Office 402.963.8905
listfile DIRECTXA MODULE * (date
FILENAME FILETYPE FM FORMAT LRECL RECS BLOCKS DATE
TIME
DIRECTXA MODULE D2 V 65535 4 24 2007-04-15
12:58:14
DIRECTXA MODULE S2 V 65535 4 24 2008-04-14
10:12:01
-Original Message-
From: The
Hello John and Scott,
I have the same time stamps as Scott.
John, I am at service level 703.
q cplevel
z/VM Version 5 Release 3.0, service level 0703 (64-bit)
Generated at 05/01/08 14:24:25 EDT
IPL at 05/07/08 00:07:49 EDT
I'm at:
z/VM Version 5 Release 3.0, service level 0701 (64-bit)
Thank you,
Scott R Wandschneider
Senior Systems Programmer
Infocrossing
Office 402.963.8905
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edward M. Martin
Sent: Thursday,
On Thursday, 05/22/2008, John Romanowski wrote:
FYI, with VM5.3, a 2007 back-level DIRECTXA MODULE on MAINT D-disk
(51D), is found and used before the serviced DIRECTXA MODULE S2.
IBM's VM5.3 file VMSYS:MAINT.CPDV.OBJECT MINIDISK MAP lists DIRECTXA
MODULE as part of the shipped contents of
21 matches
Mail list logo
