Do you have Reed Mullen's presentation? I can't remember where I saw it
last, but it covers the different flavors of virtualization. There was also
another at SHARE in Aug that compared/contrasted the various kinds of
virtualizatoin.
Marcy Cortes
Team Lead, Enterprise Virtualization - z/VM
Rob, you must be getting old: still writing EXEC1 or EXEC2 code;-)
- EXEC1 read continiously from disk
- EXEC2 had a buffer (could store the whole EXEC by coding &BUFFER *)
But, REXX execs are completely loaded in storage before execution starts.
Apart from that I share your thoughts: CMS waits to
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 7:26 AM, Alan Ackerman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ideas on what value z/VM adds would be appreciated!
Starting point should be the presentations that Reed Mullen does at
various events on the value of z/VM for running Linux workloads, and
the comparison between z/VM and o
TAPEMAP. Should be available on any of the VM Workshop tapes; won't
report density correctly on post-3490 drives, but will produce a summary
report of just about everything else you might need. Contact me offlist
if you can't find a copy.
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operatin
Could you send a copy to me, or list the link?
Ed Martin
Aultman Health Foundation
330-588-4723
ext 40441
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Danny Padilla
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 3:50 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK
I have version 3.066 dated 1998-06-04 on my download page:
http://zvm.sru.edu/~download
/Fran Hensler at Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania USA for 45 years
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://zvm.sru.edu/~fjh +1.724.738.2153
"Yes, Virginia, there is a Slippery Rock"
---
Alan --
What Rob said. (Which I know that you know, but which
bears repeating and deserves to be heard by your architect.)
Don't make out like z/VM is a silver bullet, but be clear that
z/VM is a powerful weapon in his arsenal.
Also: I like to draw illustrations from other platforms.
Even the m
I recommend use of the term "insertion loss" instead of "overhead".
The term comes from telecomm. The affect arises from any number of
JUSTIFIED additions to a transmission line which naturally introduce
attenuation of the signal.
Add a noise filter? It will reduce noise (which you want)
but it
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:42:54 -0400 Wayne T Smith said:
>I've been asked to figure out what we have in our inventory of VM and
>VSE tapes, in preparation for moving to "new" drives/media.
>
>I'm expecting to write a PIPE that will do the required summary, more or
>less iterating to a final solution
TBROWSE was indeed written by Yossie Silverman but it is now maintained
by Rick Bourgeois - [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of Virtual Software Systems, Inc.
I now have it on my download page at:
http://zvm.sru.edu/~download
/Fran Hensler at Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania USA for
One thing that really bothers me about VMWARE. When I ask about performance to the people
that measure, they tell me the VMWARE contract specifically states they are not allowed to
talk about it's performance. A vendor that won't let people talk about performance must
be very afraid details wi
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barton Robinson
> Sent: 01 November 2008 23:34
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: Value added by z/VM versus VMWARE
>
>
> One thing that really bothers me about VMWARE. When I a
I am very confused indeed by this whole conversation -VMWARE and z/VM
solve different solutions. And they are both extraordinarily good at
what they do.
Just at the 10,000 foot level, VMWARE is designed to virtualize PC
hardware and z/VM virtualizes mainframe hardware. Dismissing this as
Alan,
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/resources/systems_z_news_announcement_pdf_
zvm.pdf has a discussion of z/VM vs. VMWARE in Appendix B. I've seen a
link to an entire white paper devoted to a comparison of the two. I
thought it was on IBM's site, but a quick search didn't find it.
14 matches
Mail list logo
