Re: Last release for 3420s?

2009-06-09 Thread Chip Davis
On 6/8/09 17:05 Michael Harding said: The early Hollywood depictions tended to feature card sorters or collators, only occasionally tape drives. Had to have some sort of visible action. I remember one though (Goliath, I think) about a computer that was taking over the world, which had a room

Re: CP FASHCOPY command fails to work on z/VM 5.4

2009-06-09 Thread Mark Pace
z/VM 5.4 at 0802 and Flashcopy works as expected. I do not have VMSECURE. My back-end storage is a DS8100. On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Hans Rempel h...@hmrconsultants.com wrote: I tried it on my second LPAR which does NOT have VMSECURE and I get the same results. Looks like it is CP

Re: CP FASHCOPY command fails to work on z/VM 5.4

2009-06-09 Thread Hans Rempel
I tried it on my second LPAR which does NOT have VMSECURE and I get the same results. Looks like it is CP related. We are running RSU 901. Hans From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Hans Rempel Sent: June 8, 2009 5:08 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

Re: CP FASHCOPY command fails to work on z/VM 5.4

2009-06-09 Thread Alan Altmark
On Tuesday, 06/09/2009 at 08:56 EDT, Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com wrote: z/VM 5.4 at 0802 and Flashcopy works as expected. I do not have VMSECURE. My back-end storage is a DS8100. - ESS (Shark, 2105) offers FlashCopy v1 and FlashCopy v2 (aka Point-in-Time Copy, PTC) - DS6000 (1750) offers only

Old address cleanup

2009-06-09 Thread Burton, Randy
This is really strange. I left Wachovia in December, and turned on the autoreply on my mailbox. Wachovia should have deleted the mailbox and the email address, sometime after I left. I probably did forget to delete my Wachovia email address from this listserv, but I would have thought it would

Re: Old address cleanup

2009-06-09 Thread Jack Woehr
Burton, Randy wrote: Very strange - why would the darn thing have waited 6 months, then sent 66 of the autoreply messages? Go figure! It didn't wait six months. It has been periodically crying for help on this list for a some time. I've posted jokes about it before. It decided it wasn't

Re: Old address cleanup

2009-06-09 Thread Huegel, Thomas
Sounds like Wachovia needs to contact the feds to get some bailout/stimulus money to clean up old mail boxes. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Burton, Randy Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 8:40 AM To:

Re: Old address cleanup

2009-06-09 Thread Schuh, Richard
3.5 billion ought to do it. :-) Regards, Richard Schuh -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Huegel, Thomas Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 7:15 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Old address cleanup

Re: Old address cleanup

2009-06-09 Thread Daniel P. Martin
The problem subscription was removed from the list Sunday evening. The show's over, folks. Please move along. -dan. On Jun 9, 2009, at 10:53, Schuh, Richard rsc...@visa.com wrote: 3.5 billion ought to do it. :-) Regards, Richard Schuh -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM

Re: CP FASHCOPY command fails to work on z/VM 5.4

2009-06-09 Thread Hans Rempel
I tried it on my second LPAR which does NOT have VMSECURE and I get the same results. Looks like it is CP related. We are running RSU 901. Hans From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Hans Rempel Sent: June 8, 2009 5:08 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

Totally Off Topic: Time to get out the black helicopters.

2009-06-09 Thread David Boyes
http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2009/06/teddy_bears_now_symbolize_frau.html?mid=daily-intel--20090609 Somebody needs to correct these... people. They're messing with the Bear. n Db n

HMC questions

2009-06-09 Thread clifford jackson
I am currently running a z/890 A04 130 running z/VM 5.3 HMC Version Code 1.8.2 with z890 / Driver level 55 and my SE level is 233. My question is I need to upgrade my HMC to Version Code 2.9.2 which would require perhaps a new HMC running Linux as opposed to the current OS/2 based HMC or