Re: Console spool?

2009-08-11 Thread Ivica Brodaric
You make it sound so grandiose. :-) Hmm, yes I went on for a while didn't I? I hope my story was illustrative and easy to remember at least.

Setting up APPC for PTK

2009-08-11 Thread Shimon Lebowitz
I am really confused, trying to set up an APPC connection between two performance toolkit machines. the instructions I am reading are at: http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zvm/v5r4/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.zvm.v54.hcpl7/cbfapp.htm They are full of AVS references, but I understood from this

Gavin Appleton is out of the office.

2009-08-11 Thread Gavin Appleton
I will be out of the office starting 11/08/2009 and will not return until 13/08/2009. I will respond to your message when I return.

Re: Setting up APPC for PTK

2009-08-11 Thread Kris Buelens
the APPC resource id's must be unique in an ISFC collection (as you know). But, PTK uses FCXRES00 as resource id to identify itself. WIth an UCOMDIR NAMES on the A-disk of PTK, you can translate this. On the A-system, code this: :nick.FCXRES00 :tpn.FCXRES_A Note: after creation/update of an

Re: IOCP, Dynamic I/O and Tokens

2009-08-11 Thread Frankovich, Bob
I got an hour this morning so I came in at 5:00 to perform the POR on our z9. The original IOCP change was to change an OSA port from Non-QDIO to QDIO but I also added MAXDEV=(CSS(0),500,0) to the RESOURCE. After the POR, I tried to do an ACTIVATE and received a message about insufficient

Re: EMail with a binary attachment

2009-08-11 Thread Tom Anderson
On Thu Aug 6 7:38 , Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com sent: [...] What you may or may not do to someone's code/executables is governed by the license (I sound like a broken record..hey..kids don't know what that means any more!). If it isn't mentioned in the license, then you have to

Re: Setting up APPC for PTK

2009-08-11 Thread Shimon Lebowitz
Thank you, That did it! Kris said: the APPC resource id's must be unique in an ISFC collection (as you know). But, PTK uses FCXRES00 as resource id to identify itself. WIth an UCOMDIR NAMES on the A-disk of PTK, you can translate this. On the A-system, code this: :nick.FCXRES00

Re: EMail with a binary attachment

2009-08-11 Thread Shimon Lebowitz
What really cracked me up was the kid at my door who asked if he could use the phone. When shown to the device, he looked at the dial dumbly and asked umm.. how do you work this? Original message Date:   Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:49:22 PDT From:   Tom Anderson tp...@speakeasy.net

Re: IOCP, Dynamic I/O and Tokens

2009-08-11 Thread Mike At HammockTree
Bob, you hit a fairly frequently occuring problem. A number of the HMC panels are, in my view, poorly designed or labeled. There are numerous times when you need to take (click on) the non-intutative option. Some of the more intiative options appear to exit, but actually leave the task

Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting

2009-08-11 Thread Alan Ackerman
That's the first thing I thought of, too -- but note that there is no z/V M in this picture, just z/OS and PR/SM. z/OS does recognize the existence of z/VM but it still does no t handshake with z/VM as far as I know. Have I missed something? Alan Ackerman Alan (dot) Ackerman (at) Bank of

Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting

2009-08-11 Thread Alan Altmark
On Sunday, 08/09/2009 at 11:01 EDT, Alan Ackerman alan.acker...@earthlink.net wrote: The MP effect is determined by the operating system and by the workload. It is not simply a hardware effect at all. If two or more processors access the same memory location -- one will have to wait. True

Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting

2009-08-11 Thread Alan Altmark
On Wednesday, 08/12/2009 at 01:01 EDT, Alan Ackerman alan.acker...@earthlink.net wrote: That's the first thing I thought of, too -- but note that there is no z/VM in this picture, just z/OS and PR/SM. z/OS does recognize the existence of z/VM but it still does not handshake with z/VM as far