No, TRANSFER is what it says, the object is transferred, not
copied/cloned/xxx
As you do not have the privilege to use DIAG D4 to set the origin, you
could create a service machine that has the privilege, it could perform the
copies of the spool files x times.
2009/9/22 Gonen Shoham
Greetings,
I saw this post and would like to get some verification on running both layer 2
and layer 3 on the same OSA.
So we can now have say a z/VM running Linux guest on a layer 2 to an OSA along
with a layer 3 TCP stack on the same z/VM using the same OSA?
Would we be able to also
Thanks for the responses. I was able to get the file to my A disk!
Thanks again to all!
Thank You,
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin - Information Technology
z/OS z/VM Systems - Performance and Tuning
Cell - 443 632-4191
Work - 410 786-0386
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov
WFH Tuesdays and Fridays
On Tuesday, 09/22/2009 at 08:10 EDT, russell.gendr...@custserv.com wrote:
I saw this post and would like to get some verification on running both
layer 2
and layer 3 on the same OSA.
Yes, you can run both and they can even talk to each other. In the
distant past, layer 2 and layer 3 could
I don't think the analogy to a ping attack is a particularly fair
one. Yes, from the perspective of an innocent third user, they
look the same, perhaps, but they aren't.
??? In both cases, normal function of the innocent guest is disrupted by a
force beyond it's control through no fault of
On Tuesday, 09/22/2009 at 03:10 EDT, Gonen Shoham gone...@sapiens.com
wrote:
TRAN RDR does it ok, but deletes the file from my reader.
Is there anyway to keep the RDR after TRAN RDR ?
The reason is that I need to TRAN the RDR many times .
No. A spool file exists only once in the system.
The earlier OSAs had special code to enable IPv6. I (and many others, I’m sure)
screamed at IBM that having them in the loop of OSA firmware protocol support
for every possible protocol that someone was going to need was unsustainable,
which resulted in the layer 2 support.
If you’re doing
The partition is the easy part, just follow the model of the DUMP space in
spool. But how, if you cannot even get a command entered by a logged on user,
are you going to be able to make use of it?
I think that the idea of putting the collar on the runaway process or guest has
to be solved
On Tuesday, 09/22/2009 at 11:34 EDT, David Boyes dbo...@sinenomine.net
wrote:
Wrt to dedicated vs VSWITCH, use VSWITCH if you possibly can. Isolates
you from
the weirdnesses of the various OSAs, and the impact of the extra code is
minimal.
I don't know about weirdness, but in practical
Now THAT would have exposed the problem. :-) Actually, he already tried that
and the result has been this discussion.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
I'm sure that there are a couple other ways of preventing the
problem, like IPL'ing the machine first and doing a Q V ALL
to see what resources
I have been asked if there is a utility that converts ISPF menus into XMENU/E
format. Can anyone tell me if there is one available? I know of none.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
Is it just us or are others having trouble getting to Barton's site?
Regards,
Richard Schuh
Schuh, Richard wrote:
Is it just us or are others having trouble getting to Barton's site?
Regards,
Richard Schuh
Not just you; I'm having trouble with that site and linuxvm.org that
shares the same system.
Kim Goldenberg
State of NJ
The Velocity site is back online. Despite alternate power, our DS6800
apparently took a hit this morning during a power failure. I don't have all
the facts at this time, but our site is up.
(I'm not sure if this drops the us to 5-9s or not...(?))
Regards, Len
In a message dated
On Tuesday, 09/22/2009 at 08:32 EDT, Anson yeal_c...@yahoo.com.cn wrote:
But what will happen if the zLinux use dedicated OSA devices directly in
stead
of vswitch? It still need layer2 support? As my understanding, it
should be
different case, right?
The choice of layer 2 or 3 depends
15 matches
Mail list logo
