*** Cross posted to VSE and VM Lists ***
Hello Listers, I was asked to find out how many DB2 Server for VSE VM
customers will be attending the WAVV, 2010. Please respond off list. Thanks.
Regards,
...Roland
A PMR has been opened to report this VMLINK problem. I will be opening a
n
APAR. In the meantime, I have placed a R540 fixtest out on the IBM FTP s
ite
(testcase.software.ibm.com/fromibm/vm): VMLINK CEX76434 (compiled EXEC) a
nd
VMLINK SXE76434 (non-compiled EXEC). The fixtest should remain on
Alan Altmark said:
Mike said minidisk rather than a dedicated full disk. Since the context of
prior posts was full-pack minidisks (FPMD), I applied the same qualifier to
Mike's use of minidisk. I'm not going to try to compare the CCW translation
costs of a non-FPMD to a dedicated device
Ah, but while that was true of a ³real² 3390, is that also now true of
emulated 3390¹s which are split across varying numbers of essentially SCSI
disks? A single 3390 mod 27 might be split up over several 9 gig physical
disks in order to implement the emulation. Is the controller smart enough to
On 3/26/2010 at 12:44 PM, RPN01 nix.rob...@mayo.edu wrote:
Is the controller smart enough to
be able to start an I/O to each, even though the I/O*s were sent to the same
3390 address?
It might be, but CP and Linux are not, so the waters aren't all that muddy
after all. We really don't want
But just to push things a bit further, isn't PAV the key to getting into the
rat's nest successfully? If a volume has PAV aliases, then CP can start more
than one I/O on the volume at a time. And, if it is sufficiently broken into
smaller minidisks, then Linux can take advantage of the PAV paths
On Friday, 03/26/2010 at 12:45 EDT, RPN01 nix.rob...@mayo.edu wrote:
Ah, but while that was true of a ?real? 3390, is that also now true of
emulated
3390?s which are split across varying numbers of essentially SCSI disks?
A
single 3390 mod 27 might be split up over several 9 gig physical
On Friday, 03/26/2010 at 12:26 EDT, Schuh, Richard rsc...@visa.com
wrote:
As evidenced by the statements in the post repeated below, there is
discussion
of the offset from real cylinder 0 to real cylinder 1. That implies a
protected
cylinder 0 and necessitates CCW translation, does it not?
If it violates UArk rules, shouldn't you take the post off the archive? (
Yes, it is still here.) That would
perhaps discourage people from posting job openings here.
Am I the only one that reads this list at http://listserv.uark.edu/archi
ves/ibmvm.html?
Alan Ackerman
alan (dot) ackerman
