Thanks Marcy
Best Regards,
Martin Magat
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Marcy Cortes
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 11:14 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SLES9 zLinux on zVM
The linux-390 list might be a
Does any one know how a tape drive gets into this state:
vary on 182
HCPCPN6289I Device 0182 cannot be varied online because it is quiesced
for maintenance.
1 device(s) specified; 0 device(s) successfully varied online
q paths 182
Device 0182, Status
Can you re-IML the tape drive?
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Sent: Thu Apr 01 06:27:42 2010
Subject: Tape is quiesced...
Does any one know how a tape drive gets into this
Is it still in maintenance mode?
On 04/01/2010 06:27 AM, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:
Does any one know how a tape drive gets into this state:
vary on 182
HCPCPN6289I Device 0182 cannot be varied online because it is quiesced
for maintenance.
1 device(s) specified; 0 device(s) successfully
Suppose we could...but could a CE just flip a switch? These are 3590s.
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of McBride, Catherine
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 6:31 AM
To:
These are 3590s, what is maintenance mode on these drives?
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Rich Smrcina
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 6:40 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Tape
If you issue the command HELP HCP6289I, it seems to imply that there is
a control unit indicator of 'maintenance mode'. Call the CE and ask if
that is a possibility.
On 04/01/2010 06:43 AM, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:
These are 3590s, what is maintenance mode on these drives?
Frank M.
I believe the z/ versions are registered trade marked
they have an R by the name
z/VM®
munson
201-418-7588
Tom Huegel tehue...@gmail.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
03/31/2010 11:24 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System
My stand alone ( ie not in a library ) set of 4 3590 drives has a
little switch labelled with a wrench icon on the same panel as the
power switch for the frame. I've personally never touched it - but
perhaps yours got flipped?
--
Jay Brenneman
Wish I could tell you...I'm about 146 miles away from our data center.
Operations has told us that the CE is coming in at 9am.
Thanks!
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Robert J Brenneman
The simple answer to your question is that the volume is not attached to the
system. So, when the guest tries to link the minidisk, there is no real
volume for it to contact.
It looks like the deeper problem is understanding how volumes work. Let me
try to explain.
What you refer to as the
http://www.ibm.com/legal/us/en/copytrade.shtml
Martha, excellent reply. I also noticed that he is using the MW on the
minidisk statement. He should know and please correct me if I'm wrong,
if he accesses these disks from multiple machines the OS or software
running on those machines need to drive the enq/deq for the device so
that he doesn't
On Wednesday, 03/31/2010 at 11:24 EDT, Tom Huegel tehue...@gmail.com
wrote:
Are any of the IBM OS,s trade marked?
VM/ESA, z/VM, z/OS, z/VSE, and OS/390 are all registered trademarks of IBM
(at least in the US). As Carol posted,
http://www.ibm.com/legal/us/en/copytrade.shtml (I include z/VSE
In the same spirit of Google's new name (see http://www.google.com/
and http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/different-kind-of-company-name.html)
IBM should rename system z to system y, and get rid of the whole zee
vs. zed pronunciation debate!
Then sales persons who are also Abbot and Costello
Correction: *publicizing* the office productivity suite. Amoco
(IIRC) gets the invention prize for that little gem.
To be correct, PROFS was developed as by IBM Dallas for Amoco,
then release as a PRPQ, then as a product.
Jim
I hope someone can confirm for me the difference between OSA2 and OSA3.
Next week I will be receiving a z10 to replace a z9. For the sake of
simplicity lets say I had 1 OSA2. That would be 2 ports or 2 CHPIDs. On
those CHPIDs I have 3 addresses each CHPID 1 100-103 - CHPID 2 200-203.
Each
Mark, we have one using the other port.
PORTNAME is not what you want. You want to use the .P0x stuff. something like
DEFINE VSWITCH VSW1 RDEV F150.P01 F170
The F170 in this case becomes F170.P00
Marcy
From: The IBM z/VM Operating
On Thursday, 04/01/2010 at 02:30 EDT, Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com wrote:
Now the z10 is coming. The OSA2 has been replaced with an OSA3
1000-baseT
-2P. So now I have 1 CHPID with 2 ports. IF, and it's a big IF, I
understand
how it works, I can still create the 2 address ranges on the 1
Thank you, Marcie and Alan. All the examples in the OSA guides only talk
about z/OS the TRLE, I couldn't find an example for z/VM.
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.comwrote:
On Thursday, 04/01/2010 at 02:30 EDT, Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com wrote:
Now the z10
This is a bit unrelated to your questions but one major difference between
the OSA2 and OSA3 100-Base-T card is that if you define a port on the OSA3
as an OSC channel for use as an OSA-ICC, then the second port on the card is
disabled and will not be used as an OSD or OSE type device. Basically,
You are correct. We were ordering an extra OSA3 to have more options, but
with having an OSAC, that extra, isn't any longer.
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Aria Bamdad a...@bsc.gwu.edu wrote:
This is a bit unrelated to your questions but one major difference
between the OSA2 and OSA3
What irks me even mor is the audasity of the VMware folks to steal the 'VM'
part of the name. If they wanted to be different couldn't they have used VS?
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Jim Elliott jelli...@gdlvm7.vnet.ibm.comwrote:
Correction: *publicizing* the office productivity suite.
23 matches
Mail list logo
