I don't see any need/benefit to create another VTAM saved segment (guessing
both VTAMs will use the same VTAM SW level). Having both VTAMs use the same
segment even saves some real storage, so why do you say to avoid any
storage complaints?
The VTAM segment can even fall inside the DEF STORAGE
Thanks Kris,
I didn't know that 2 VTAMs can use the same VTAM DCSS concurrently. Will
there be no storage problem if the number of defined LUs increases with
the 2nd VTAM or is this possible problem only related to the GCS segment
which I will rebuild as a GCS2 segment and user.
kind
The GCS segment must be unique indeed, it contains SW type storage (that is
Shared Write). And access to that SW storage need to be controlled. GCS
has mechanisms to make it possible to avoid programs stepping on
each-other. But, these mechanisms provided integrity in a single GCS
group. The
Kris,
thanks for your explanation. I have now sucessfully created my 2nd GCS
segment GCS2 with the group member GCS2 ASSEMBLE
CONFIG SYSNAME=GCS2, X
RECVM=GCS2, X
DUMPVM=MAINT,
Can't you connect to your z/VSE CICS's via VTAM CDRM CDRSC instead of
using a CUU for each session?
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Franz Josef Pohlen
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 11:43 PM
A virtual CTCA between the VM/VTAM and zVSE/VTAM ?
Regards Lim ML
On 19/10/10 8:12 PM, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:
Can't you connect to your z/VSE CICS's via VTAM CDRM CDRSC instead of
using a CUU for each session?
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM
Exactly.
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Lim Ming Liang
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 7:51 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: how to change the name of VTAM-NSS
A virtual CTCA
Does the EXTENT: specified relate to the order of the PARM on the SYSRES
disk? (i.e. 1 will always be the earliest PARM allocation on the disk)
CYLINDER ALLOCATION CURRENTLY IS AS FOLLOWS:
TYPE START ENDTOTAL
- ----
PERM 0
of course, this is exactly the way I use to connect to zVSE, but on VM
vtam you need non-SNA definitions for each session which uses a separate
device number each. To this device I dial from the SCEXIT. And VM VTAM
only accepts 3-digit device numbers. So if you reach 4096 sessions (a
bit less
Before I go off and write something, does anyone have a favorite method to do
this? I’ve checked out Scott Nettleship’s SFSTOOLS package, and it has some
handy bits for writing such a thing, but not the whole process. Something like
rsync for SFS?
(context: I need to consolidate several
Yes it does. PARM 39 is CF1 PARM 159 is CF2 and PARM 279 is CF3, unless you
relocate the PARM allocations.
BTW, if you would press enter on the SAPL screen, it will show the CYL or
MDISK OFFSET of each PARM disk.
Ray Waters
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
Yes - and you can have more than up to 9. Oddly enough - this is
documented in HELP CP SHUTDOWN -- see the EXTENT option...
Scott Rohling
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Frank M. Ramaekers
framaek...@ailife.comwrote:
Does the EXTENT: specified relate to the order of the PARM on the SYSRES
Did you look at FILEPOOL UNLOAD FILESPACE followed by FILEPOOL
RELOAD? That's what that command is supposed to be able to do - move
filespaces from one filepool to another. Or are you looking for a way
to move a batch of users? That shouldn't be too hard to do with a
small exec, since the
On 10/19/10 10:14 AM, Bruce Hayden bjhay...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you look at FILEPOOL UNLOAD FILESPACE followed by FILEPOOL
RELOAD? That's what that command is supposed to be able to do - move
filespaces from one filepool to another. Or are you looking for a way
to move a batch of
Oh, if you change the extent and hit enter, it will show you the offset
of that PARM disk. And if you enter an undefined EXTENT:
EXTENT NOT FOUND IN ALLOCATION MAP
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
The allocation map of the PARM disks and the MDISKS: CF1, CF2 and CF3 in the
MAINT VM directory must all match.
Pressing enter on the SAPL screen will replace the zeroes with the CYL in the
MINIDISK OFFSET.
You can also change the EXTENT to 1 2 or 3 ... whichever PARM disk you want to
IPL
I would like to connect my Level 2 Spool to my Level 1 Spool via RSCS, so
that when I flip the configuration making Level 2, Level 1 and vice versa,
my Level 2 Spool that was Level 1 could then be accessed from Level 1.
I suppose it would begin with defining a VCTC.
But if anyone has done
From google found this related article :
On Thursday, 08/26/2010 at 05:06 EDT, Dieltiens Geert
geert.dielti...@inf.vanbreda.be wrote:
I'm looking into the TN3270E server of TCP/IP for z/VM 5.4 as a
replacement for a Cisco CIP/CPA TN3270E server. I have briefly tested
the VM TN3270E
Wasn't there a sample EXEC to rename a filespace? Then you could do the
rename before the FILEPOOL UNLOAD/RELOAD.
2010/10/19 David Boyes dbo...@sinenomine.net
On 10/19/10 10:14 AM, Bruce Hayden bjhay...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you look at FILEPOOL UNLOAD FILESPACE followed by FILEPOOL
You can also unload an entire Storage Group with FILEPOOL UNLOAD.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Bruce Hayden
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 7:15 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
You could connect your RSCS's with VCTC, or go through TCPIP with TCPNJE.
Either way, all you really need to do is write an exec to TAG all of the
files in your L1 spool to go to L2, e.g.
PIPE CP QUERY READER ALL | SPECS W1 NW W2 | STEM FILES.'
Do I=1 To Files.0
Parse Var Files.I Owner
RSCS doesn't connect the spool, but it can allow you to send spool
files between the systems. But, did you purchase the RSCS license
with z/VM? If you didn't, you can't use RSCS to create an NJE
connection between the systems.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:04 AM, George Henke/NYLIC
On 10/19/10 11:15 AM, Kris Buelens kris.buel...@gmail.com wrote:
Wasn't there a sample EXEC to rename a filespace? Then you could do the
rename before the FILEPOOL UNLOAD/RELOAD.
Yes (there's actually a command to do it now: FILEPOOL RENAME), but then you
lose all the authorizations and
A filepool administrator can create aliases on behalf of any user. The syntax
is the same as the general user command. The major restriction on aliases is
that they can't cross filepools. If you move one user to a new pool, he can't
have aliases in the new pool pointing to base files in the
And of course, Kris pulls something out of his magic hat right after I spend
the afternoon writing one of my own
Thanks, Kris. Your tool worked perfectly (after I found somewhere to store a
2.1 million record PACKLIB...) and has the extra bonus NJE sauce. ++good,
Citizen!
-- db
On
On Thursday, 10/14/2010 at 01:44 EDT, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
But will 6.1 run on a z9 or less? No, I've tried it.
So for a seamless migration to new hardware, maybe it is not so bad to
change
one thing at a time and keep 5.4.
True, there is less risk
On Wednesday, 10/13/2010 at 03:11 EDT, Tom Huegel tehue...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here it is... When the server gets something from TOM like cmd MSG OP
CMD Q T
it will change it to FOR TOM CMD MSG OP Q T. I think that just might
work
The FOR command does not change the origin of the
On Monday, 10/18/2010 at 12:26 EDT, Michael Coffin
michaelcof...@mccci.com wrote:
I?ve never had an occasion to use ICKSADSF from SALIPL until now (I have
a
clone of my system with NO PAGE or SPOL, so it crashes right after IPL),
so I
need to allocate a couple of packs. No big deal, I?ll
I presume it is on your download site by now :-)
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of David Boyes
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 1:12 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Copying
I thought I saw some detail document for SFB which discussed the creation
and contents of BCHTIMER files.
My current system has been creating automagically and spooling them to
MAINT for several years.
No sure what is triggering the process.
Also any idea of how much disk space is needed for
George, what are BCHTIMER files?
On 10/19/2010 6:50 PM, George Henke/NYLIC wrote:
I thought I saw some detail document for SFB which discussed the
creation and contents of BCHTIMER files.
My current system has been creating automagically and spooling them to
MAINT for several years.
No sure
They appear to get created when I run SFB' SFBLOK BKUP for non-SDF Spool
Files.
I thought I saw a write-up on this somewhere.
Dave Jones d...@vsoft-software.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
10/19/2010 07:55 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating
32 matches
Mail list logo
