This VM system runs in BC mode not PR/SM. You should trust the floating point
arithmetic in SAS
Derek Ackerman
Enterprise Capacity Planning
Performance Management
Infocrossing Inc
(206) 432-9737 || C: (206) 225-3585 || derek.acker...@infocrossing.com
Please consider the environment before
I always thought that the total VM time, as well as the virtual, would
be less than the connect time. Is it normal for the total time to be
greater than the connect time? This happens a lot...
Derek Ackerman
Enterprise Capacity Planning
Performance Management
Infocrossing Inc
Confidentiality
you're converting the units. Virtual and Total time are in
milliseconds and connect time is in seconds. Are you seeing this even
after converting all of them to the same units?
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Ackerman, Derek
derek.acker...@infocrossing.com wrote:
I always thought
servers with multiple cpus, you divide cputime by the
number of cpus?
Ackerman, Derek wrote:
Yes, and I always divide the CPU time by 1000.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU]
On Behalf Of Bruce Hayden
Sent: Friday, February 18
System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU]
On
Behalf Of Barton Robinson
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:05 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files
and for linux servers with multiple cpus, you divide cputime by the
number of cpus?
Ackerman, Derek wrote
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files
and for linux servers with multiple cpus, you divide cputime by the
number of cpus?
Ackerman, Derek wrote:
Yes, and I always divide the CPU time by 1000.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
Is anyone transmitting to an MVS host the VM Monitor data to be processed by
MXG/SAS programs?
Derek Ackerman
Enterprise Capacity Planning
Performance Management
Infocrossing Inc
(206) 432-9737 || C: (206) 225-3585 || derek.acker...@infocrossing.com
Please consider the environment before
Any one know where the sample source is that is IBM supplied?
I thought I read CUA=?11F
Derek Ackerman
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any attachment to it, may contain
material that is confidential, proprietary, privileged and/or Protected Health
Information, within
. If that is so, I think (IIRC) that
the RETRIEVE would resume its recording. Have you tried tracing the EXT to see
if it is being reflected?
Regards,
Richard Schuh
_
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ackerman, Derek
Sent: Tuesday
Of 12 VM systems all but one get the external from 'CP SEND CP ECPAPM CP EXT'
the one that fails seems to not get it or ignores it, anybody know where to
look? The directory perhaps?
Derek Ackerman
Capacity Planning etc.
(201) 759-0833
_
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ackerman, Derek
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 7:11 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: send external ints
Of 12 VM systems all but one get the external from 'CP SEND CP ECPAPM CP EXT'
the one
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ackerman, Derek
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 7:11 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: send external ints
Of 12 VM systems all but one get the external from 'CP SEND CP ECPAPM CP EXT'
the one that fails seems to not get it or ignores it, anybody know where
Is the issuer of CP SEND secondary user of ECPARM? If not, has the issuer of
CP SEND CLASS C?
2007/9/25, Ackerman, Derek [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
'CP SEND CP ECPAPM CP EXT' is sent to a DSC SVM (ECPAPM) that is executing the
'Retrieve Account' command. Like I said it works
,
Richard Schuh
_
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ackerman, Derek
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 11:00 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: send external ints
'CP SEND CP ECPAPM CP EXT' is sent to a DSC SVM (ECPAPM
14 matches
Mail list logo
