Sending to the mailing list... g -- not sure why I reply to some users
and it goes to them instead of the list..
Scott
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Scott Rohling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Here's my code to do a quick report on one or more ACCOUNT files:
> (yo
Couple questions -- Are the volumes attached to the Linux guests or are
they defined as minidisks? Are the volumes shared with z/OS and is there
any potential for them to be altered by z/OS?
Scott Rohling
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) <
[EMAIL PROTEC
ipped...
(the details are sketchy but it's related to having a valid VTOC and space
being used)
Does anybody have some code they can share that does such a thing (make the
volume visible to z/OS with a valid VTOC and show the volume as being used?)
Thanks !
Scott Rohling
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 a
Yes it does --
And the answer appears to be issuing SET AUTOREAD OFF ! So a big thanks to
Jim Bohnsack for that tidbit!!
Thanks again to all who responded.. I love this mailing list :-)
Scott Rohling
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Hughes, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Does
CP SET RUN ON is already in the PROFILE EXEC - but I'll try out AUTOREAD OFF
-- Thanks!
Scott Rohling
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Jim Bohnsack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you include SET AUTOREAD OFF at the end of your PROFILE EXEC that should
> take care of it. I
A CPFMTXA LABEL should do it for you.. Just label the volume appropriately
--
And - Issue a CPFMTXA ALLOCATE to see what the current allocation is - and
then get out of there if it's allocated as PERM (as I'd expect)..
Scott Rohling
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Howard Rifki
R as I was doing this -- but it
still doesn't seem normal that it would end up in VM READ ..
Can anyone tell me if this is normal behaviour - or if I really need to
execute something (do forever;"CP SLEEP 1 MIN";end) to get it to stay out of
VM READ?
Thanks for any assistance..
Scott Rohling
Yes...
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 27, 2008, at 5:48 PM, Thomas Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Could we still get onto that userid via LOGONBY?
/Tom Kern
Alan Altmark wrote:
A possible compromise could be:
ALTUSER userid NOPHRASE NOPASSWORD
will completely remove the password and phrase.
Check out this: http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247316.html (
Introduction to the New Mainframe: z/VM Basics)
Pretty sure there's something about spool in there (can't find my copy at
the moment and my network is slow)
Scott Rohling
IBM Redbooks <http://www.red
erformance and Tuning***
>
> *Cell - 443 632-4191***
>
> *Work - 410 786-0386***
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --
>
> *From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
> Behalf Of *Scott Rohling
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 23, 20
Have you altered your SYSTEM CONFIG and perhaps taken the processor offline
by mistake? If so - you can use SALIPL screen to point to a previous
version of the system config ...
Scott Rohling
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:11 PM, David Kreuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> um how much
Just logon to MAINT using LOGONBY with your personal userid/pw
Scott Rohling
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> One last thing on this. Am I logged on with my user id and password then
> from there logonby
te manager or system
owner, and/or security group.
Hope that helps -
Scott Rohling
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>
> I am working on the z/VM z/Linux POC. I have set up z/VM for this POC and
> ha
Thanks Kris and Alan --
I created a VMXEVENT profile and added the members TRANSFER.D/NOCTL,
TRANSFER.G/NOCTL, TAG/NOCTL -- did a refresh -- and voila -- no more
annoying messages. Thanks very much!!
Scott Rohling
hing to
do with VMXEVENT/SETEVENT .. but just not sure.. Thanks for any insight!
Scott Rohling
I'm behind you David .. given all the posts informing us of various SystemZ
expos, SHARE conferences, et al -- your announcement was certainly right in
line with that. Information about events is always welcome.. shrug off
the uninitiated :-) Thanks for your post --
Scott Rohling
O
Yes - that's interesting -- I don't see John's response in this thread now..
But hey - Jim - I appreciate the response regardless! If anything, it's
good confirmation :-) Thanks very much for taking time to reply!
Scott Rohling
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Rob
freed without an IPL.
> >
> >Thanks for any assistance!
> >
> >Scott Rohling
>
> DEFINE CPOWNED SLOT nnn RESERVED
>
> John Franciscovich
> z/VM Development
>
lot can be freed without an IPL.
Thanks for any assistance!
Scott Rohling
Thanks, Richard -- I appreciate the insight. I've learned that you need
to specify what you do NOT want and rarely need to specify what you DO want
:-) So your comments are relevant to me.
Scott
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Richard Corak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott,
>
> The goal
As nerve-wracking as it can be -- there really is no better learning
experience than fixing things like this in a crisis.. Welcome to
disaster-avoided club, Terry :-)
Scott
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 12:34:19
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Quay, Jonathan (IHG) <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you do it as a full pack i.e. 0 END?
>
>
>
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Scott Rohling
> Sent: Sun 9/14/
No - DEF MDISK will not show 0 users - I just tested against an unused
volume on our system and it shows 1 user using the volume now...
Scott
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Quay, Jonathan (IHG) <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think, but am not sure, that if you have done a DEFINE MDISK agains
Silly me - it would have shown up as CPOWN when you did the Q DE33 --
never mind :-)
Scott
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Scott Rohling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hmm.. Since it's showing 0 users -- maybe it's in the CPOWN list? Q
> CPOWN...
>
> Scott Rohling
>
>
>
Hmm.. Since it's showing 0 users -- maybe it's in the CPOWN list? Q
CPOWN...
Scott Rohling
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Quay, Jonathan (IHG) <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think, but am not sure, that if you have done a DEFINE MDISK against that
> volume somewhe
Thanks Nick and Mary Anne! We are going to use the NOTACCEPTED for the
ranges we don't want to show up. I'm still a bit confused because it seems
like only the 'negative' specification works -- but hey, I'm used to being
confused :-)
Thanks again - Scott
ks for any assistance...
Scott Rohling
Uh Yeah!! More info please! :-)
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 8, 2008, at 1:19 PM, David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Latest interesting step: I’ve gotten a partial boot of OpenVMS in a
virtual machine on System z. Some instruction emulation still needs
work (the Alpha POP is a little un
FILELIST (FULLDATE (or ISODATE) should work on 4.4
LISTFILE (FULLDATE (or ISODATE) as well...
Scott Rohling
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Dodds, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a customer that is on z/VM 4.4 and the CMS file dates shown in a
> filelist have only 2
sent our extent control and defaults datadvh to ya..
Scott Rohling
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Mary Zervos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could someone please send me their Z/VM 5.3 Extent Control file to peek at?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Scott Rohling wrote:
>
>>
Your EXTENT CONTROL entries came out garbled when I look at them.. I see
3390-01 in there - which is the size it seems to be using.
What do your DEFAULTS show for 3390-3 or 3390-03 or whichever you are using
in REGIONS?
It's sounding very much like it thinks these are 3390-01 -- so either it's
be
This isn't true.. DIRMAINT uses the copy on it's disks - not yours..
Scott Rohling
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Wandschneider, Scott <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Make sure you do *not* have an EXTENT CONTROL file on your "A" disk,
> DIRMAINT will u
It's sounding like the disks already have minidisks on them so you can't
allocate past those values?Can you show entries from EXTENT CONTROL (for
these volumes - and also the 3390-3 definition at the bottom (check for dupe
3390-3 defs!)) -- and also from USEDEXT ?
Scott Rohling
O
or something similar from
the Linux command line. And maybe I'll still look at cobbling together a
CGI and using a localhost webserver to present the material...
Again - thanks to all who responded here!
Scott Rohling
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:08 AM, David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
most generic set of commands so they can work anywhere.
Those who actually support, own and snuggle with their own systems will
often tend to use their own personal favorite blankets and pacifiers. ;-)
Scott Rohling
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Rich Greenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
ack (slow shmoe - use
them fancy speedy processors to hide the overhead). I do miss juggling bits
sometimes though..
Scott Rohling
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Macioce, Larry <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is my 35th year. I wrote code (for my 6 month cert) on a 360/20 and
>
h ftp
manually)
- Provides a front end (browser?) to view those files, follow links, etc
If there's no 'viewer' out there - would it be useful to anyone besides
me? I don't know if I just dreamed it but I could swear there was such a
thing out there at one time.
Scott Rohling
Dude - you're old! :-)
I'm into my 30th year using VM so I'm not too far behind you, gramps.
With fond respect - Scott
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Schuh, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I started learning assembler (it was called Autocoder on the 7080, it
> was the only language avai
chccwdev -e 691-694
To have them come on at boot-
Add range to modprobe.conf and do a mkinitrd.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 31, 2008, at 4:18 PM, "Juarez, David T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
We are running z/VM 5.3 with Red Hat Linux 5. We have created a new
guest and defined in the user
Dirm for user purge
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 29, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Rich Greenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On: Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 01:44:06PM -0400,Howard Rifkind Wrote:
} Thanks all, got a user now defined and put onlinefixed the
extent control file...
}
} Searched the docs...cou
CP Q CPDISK
VMLINK MAINT CF1 (or whatever Q CPDISK told you the parm disk was) ..
Remember there is usually more than one parm disk -- the current one should
be CF1 or accessed as A by the system..
Scott Rohling
On 7/28/08, Ian S. Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
No you don't have to worry about DIRMSAT for sure.. DATAMOVE only if you
want DIRMAINT to copy/resize/clean disks for you.. (I recommend DATAMOVE!)
Scott Rohling
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Howard Rifkind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> We just activated Dirmaint and gone
On OP1: CP TERM HOLD OFF (turns of HOLDING and just uses ...MORE)
And: CP TERM MORE 0 0 if you want the screen to clear immediately
without a ...MORE
Scott Rohling
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Howard Rifkind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Thanks for the replies.
>
> No
:-) I enjoyed the apt metaphors, Alan...
Thanks to Kris, Thomas, and Alan for their suggestions.. I'll work with the
customer to try and determine what the real scenario might have been, as
there is some confusion there. I was also give a training session on this
system and doing some unnatura
FTP and mget? (need FTPSERVE running) - NFS? (need VMNFS running)
Scott Rohling
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 7:43 AM, McMahon, Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I am looking for an easy way to download a number of CMS execs from my
> A-disk to my PC. IND$FILE works OK for 1-at-a-ti
#x27;SET SYSOPER OPERATOR'
We'll see how that works out.. Thanks again for the speedy responses!
Scott Rohling
on OPERATOR after
a
SHUTDOWN REIPL?
Thanks for any insight!
Scott Rohling
501 - 547 of 547 matches
Mail list logo
