> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Thigpen
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 1:04 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: OT (humor): "Not in Plan" response to requirements
unctioning, especially these days!
Ah, where is my hydrosolator when I need it!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
01/30/2008 01:29 PM
Please respond to
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: OT (humor): "Not in Plan" response to requirements
>Has this capability been anounced yet? We could really use that.
>I tried reversing the polarity but, despite all the Star Trek I've
>watched, it didn't help. Perhaps I should have watched some MacGyver.
>Brian Nielsen
Perhaps you've run into a case that's covered by the maxim that was
poste
: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Alan Altmark
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 1:29 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: OT (humor): "Not in Plan" response to requirements
>
> On Wednesday, 01/30/2008 at 10:40 EST, Brian Ni
Did you try a sonic screwdriver?
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Brian Nielsen
Sent: 01/30/2008 10:39 AM
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:58:07 -0500, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
"I want to grow my virtual server farm by 15% every 6 months, as
measured by billions of micr
On Wednesday, 01/30/2008 at 10:40 EST, Brian Nielsen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried reversing the polarity but, despite all the Star Trek I've
> watched, it didn't help. Perhaps I should have watched some MacGyver.
Ah, a Classics man. Reversing the polarity is s Old School; it's not
You can watch "Burn Notice" when it comes back.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Nielsen
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 10:39 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: OT (humor): "Not in Plan" resp
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:58:07 -0500, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>"I want to grow my virtual server farm by 15% every 6 months, as
>measured by billions of microthingies per fortnight, but there is
>no Golden Widget that allows me to frangle a self-supporting
>side-bender efficiently.
ry 29, 2008 7:19 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: "Not in Plan" response to requirements
> Sometimes a requirement does not pass Go or collect $200 and is
rejected
> or accepted outright. Of course, business needs change all the time,
so a
> Rejection or Acceptance
> Sometimes a requirement does not pass Go or collect $200 and is
rejected
> or accepted outright. Of course, business needs change all the time,
so a
> Rejection or Acceptance is no guarantee that it will never see the
light
> of day or that it will be in release n+1.
>
> But remember that our r
On Tuesday, 01/29/2008 at 03:24 EST, David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> After having written up a lot of the requirements discussed here and
submitting
> them through a recognized user group, I received a number of rejection
notices
> with a reason of ?not in plan?.
>
> Could someone a
> But in the end, you'd like IBM not to reject the requirements, but
> implement them... Making it harder to reject them is a way to
> influence the trade-off, but not the most efficient way.
Yes. The basic tradeoff I'd hope for is that the response at least be
thoughtful enough to tell us why the
On Jan 29, 2008 9:45 PM, Huegel, Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It may be a requirement to ask IBM to prepare better 'rejection
> documentation'.
But in the end, you'd like IBM not to reject the requirements, but
implement them... Making it harder to reject them is a way to
influence the tra
It may be a requirement to ask IBM to prepare better 'rejection
documentation'.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of David Boyes
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 2:22 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: "Not in
After having written up a lot of the requirements discussed here and
submitting them through a recognized user group, I received a number of
rejection notices with a reason of "not in plan".
Could someone at IBM explain this reason a little further? I thought the
point of user requirements was
15 matches
Mail list logo
