Re: CMSDDR VMARC question

2009-10-21 Thread Alan Altmark
On Tuesday, 10/20/2009 at 09:27 EDT, Henry, Bob bob.he...@sungardhe.com wrote: Is anyone from z/VM development monitoring this thread and willing to take a look at this problem? As I said in an earlier post in answer to Bruce's question, the remote system is z/VM 5.3. FTPPUT expects the

Re: CMSDDR VMARC question

2009-10-20 Thread Henry, Bob
] On Behalf Of Bruce Hayden Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 8:08 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: CMSDDR VMARC question Is the remote system z/VM or some other platform? The ftpput stage is from z/VM development, and the source is not available for it, so I don't know what could be wrong. I've

Re: CMSDDR VMARC question

2009-10-20 Thread Bruce Hayden
5.3. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Bruce Hayden Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 8:08 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: CMSDDR VMARC question Is the remote system z/VM or some other platform

Re: CMSDDR VMARC question

2009-10-20 Thread Henry, Bob
- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Bruce Hayden Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 10:20 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: CMSDDR VMARC question I just tried a PIPEDDR dump and restore to the ftp server on a z/VM 5.4 system and it worked fine

Re: CMSDDR VMARC question

2009-10-19 Thread Bruce Hayden
Is the remote system z/VM or some other platform? The ftpput stage is from z/VM development, and the source is not available for it, so I don't know what could be wrong. I've never tried it myself to a z/VM system. On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Henry, Bob bob.he...@sungardhe.com wrote: I

Re: CMSDDR VMARC question

2009-10-19 Thread Henry, Bob
The local and remote system is z/VM 5.3. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Bruce Hayden Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 8:08 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: CMSDDR VMARC question Is the remote system z/VM

Re: CMSDDR VMARC question

2009-10-16 Thread Kris Buelens
: CMSDDR VMARC question (actually - maybe the PIPEDDR DUMP/RESTORE over TCPIP is exactly what you want? if the zVM systems have connectivity, this lets you dump a disk directly from one system to another - and will save you steps...) Scott On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Scott Rohling

Re: CMSDDR VMARC question

2009-10-16 Thread Henry, Bob
, 2009 7:36 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: CMSDDR VMARC question (actually - maybe the PIPEDDR DUMP/RESTORE over TCPIP is exactly what you want? if the zVM systems have connectivity, this lets you dump a disk directly from one system to another - and will save you steps...) Scott

Re: CMSDDR VMARC question

2009-10-16 Thread Henry, Bob
/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Scott Rohling Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 4:54 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: CMSDDR VMARC question You could skip the FTP: - On the receiving side -- PIPEDDR RESTORE BSTEA 191 (LISTEN - Note the IP port being

CMSDDR VMARC question

2009-10-15 Thread Henry, Bob
I'm using CMSDDR and VMARC to transfer some CMS minidisks via FTP. Both utilities seem to produce more output than the original data on the minidisk(s). Here's an example. User has 25 files (mostly COBOL source and/or JCL) in a 4 cylinder 3390 minidisk, blocked 4096. A Q DISK shows 76 blocks

Re: CMSDDR VMARC question

2009-10-15 Thread Scott Rohling
Don't know about VMARC -- but CMSDDR is packing the entire minidisk - empty space and all...Why not just VMARC the files on the disk and forget about CMSDDR? Scott On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Henry, Bob bob.he...@sungardhe.com wrote: I’m using CMSDDR and VMARC to transfer some CMS

Re: CMSDDR VMARC question

2009-10-15 Thread Henry, Bob
I was going to do that, but some of the MDs are VSE full volume disks. From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Scott Rohling Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 7:17 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: CMSDDR VMARC question Don't know about VMARC

Re: CMSDDR VMARC question

2009-10-15 Thread Scott Rohling
of the MDs are VSE full volume disks. *From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] *On Behalf Of *Scott Rohling *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2009 7:17 PM *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU *Subject:* Re: CMSDDR VMARC question Don't know about VMARC -- but CMSDDR

Re: CMSDDR VMARC question

2009-10-15 Thread Scott Rohling
that, but some of the MDs are VSE full volume disks. *From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] *On Behalf Of *Scott Rohling *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2009 7:17 PM *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU *Subject:* Re: CMSDDR VMARC question Don't know about VMARC -- but CMSDDR

Re: CMSDDR VMARC question

2009-10-15 Thread Henry, Bob
I’ll look into that – thanks. From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Scott Rohling Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 7:36 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: CMSDDR VMARC question (actually - maybe the PIPEDDR DUMP/RESTORE over TCPIP is exactly