Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: CP unresponsive on certain guests
I would just add that for any significant number of z/Linux guests it is
imperative that you have a robust paging subsystem and enough spool space
On 9/17/2010 at 09:24 AM, George Henke/NYLIC george_he...@newyorklife.com
wrote:
Does z/VM, unlike z/OS, still need to do a lot of paging?
In the z/OS world paging has become virtually(no pun intended :-))
non-existent.
z/VM does very little paging (if not zero) on behalf of itself.
Systems Support
Office - 443 348-2102
Cell - 443 632-4191
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Mark Post
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 10:53 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: CP unresponsive on certain guests
On 9
?
The output of
CP Q ALLOC PAGE
will provide the information
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Tate daniel.t...@gmail.com
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 10:52 AM
Subject: Re: CP unresponsive on certain guests
Output of Q SRM
q srm
IABIAS : INTENSITY
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 10:52 AM
Subject: Re: CP unresponsive on certain guests
Output of Q SRM
q srm
IABIAS : INTENSITY=90%; DURATION=2
LDUBUF : Q1=100% Q2=75% Q3=60%
STORBUF: Q1=300% Q2=250% Q3=200%
DSPBUF : Q1=32767 Q2=32767 Q3=32767
DISPATCHING MINOR
not be configured
to handle.
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Dave Jones d...@vsoft-software.com
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: CP unresponsive on certain guests
Actually, Mike, he may be better off (a bit, at least) by setting
STORBUFF 300 300
...@vsoft-software.com
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: CP unresponsive on certain guests
Actually, Mike, he may be better off (a bit, at least) by setting
STORBUFF 300 300 300.
On 09/16/2010 09:58 AM, Mike At HammockTree wrote:
Since
to
in-Q could cause a increase in paging that he may or may not be configured
to handle.
Mike
- Original Message - From: Dave Jones d...@vsoft-software.com
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: CP unresponsive on certain guests
the STORBUFF values further, as Davd suggested (300% 300% 300%).
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Tate daniel.t...@gmail.com
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: CP unresponsive on certain guests
CP Q ALLOC PAGE gives me invalid option
the STORBUFF values further, as Davd suggested (300% 300% 300%).
Mike
- Original Message - From: Daniel Tate daniel.t...@gmail.com
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: CP unresponsive on certain guests
CP Q ALLOC PAGE gives me invalid option
System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Daniel Tate
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 9:59 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] CP unresponsive on certain guests
EXTENT EXTENT TOTAL PAGES HIGH%
VOLID RDEV STARTEND PAGES IN USE
-- -- -- -- -- --
VM6PG1 9F86 1 10016 1761K 1175K 1761K 66%
VM6PG2 9F87 0 0180180180 100%
Mmf. You need to update the allocation bitmap on VM6PG2 to have it use the rest
of the disk (assuming it's
- Original Message - From: Daniel Tate daniel.t...@gmail.com
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: CP unresponsive on certain guests
CP Q ALLOC PAGE gives me invalid option - alloc.
I didnt set the SRM variables; the consultant who
...@gmail.com
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: CP unresponsive on certain guests
CP Q ALLOC PAGE gives me invalid option - alloc.
I didnt set the SRM variables; the consultant who initially came in to
set this up might have
: CP unresponsive on certain guests
CP Q ALLOC PAGE gives me invalid option - alloc.
I didnt set the SRM variables; the consultant who initially came in to
set this up might have.
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Mike At HammockTree
m...@hammocktree.us wrote:
Yeah
values further, as Davd suggested (300% 300%
300%).
Mike
- Original Message - From: Daniel Tate daniel.t...@gmail.com
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: CP unresponsive on certain guests
CP Q ALLOC PAGE gives me invalid
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Kris Buelens kris.buel...@gmail.com wrote:
You are paging on one disk only, and that disk is filled too much.
My guess is that the one installing VM6PG2 as paging device forgot format
that disk.
The 180 blocks suggests that he got at least the allocation
-2102
Cell - 443 632-4191
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Daniel Tate
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 10:52 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: CP unresponsive on certain guests
Output of Q SRM
q srm
IABIAS
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 10:52 AM
Subject: Re: CP unresponsive on certain guests
Output of Q SRM
q srm
IABIAS : INTENSITY=90%; DURATION=2
LDUBUF : Q1=100% Q2=75% Q3=60%
STORBUF: Q1=300% Q2=250% Q3=200%
DSPBUF : Q1=32767 Q2=32767 Q3=32767
DISPATCHING MINOR
: Dave Jones d...@vsoft-software.com
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: CP unresponsive on certain guests
Actually, Mike, he may be better off (a bit, at least) by setting
STORBUFF 300 300 300.
On 09/16/2010 09:58 AM, Mike At HammockTree wrote
We're starting to run apps on the servers now. From time to time a
guest will become unresponsive - to be more precise, ,the CP will not
respond to commands, and neither will the guest OS (SLES11). not
even #CP LOGOFF is acknowledged. from another login, CP INDIIC LOAD
shows no appreciable
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: CP unresponsive on certain guests
We're starting to run apps on the servers now. From time to time a
guest will become unresponsive - to be more precise, ,the CP will not
respond to commands, and neither will the guest OS (SLES11). not
even #CP LOGOFF is acknowledged. from
Q SRM
And let us know what that says.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Daniel Tate
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 3:15 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM] CP unresponsive on certain guests
We're
, 2010 6:14 PM
Subject: CP unresponsive on certain guests
We're starting to run apps on the servers now. From time to time a
guest will become unresponsive - to be more precise, ,the CP will not
respond to commands, and neither will the guest OS (SLES11). not
even #CP LOGOFF is acknowledged
24 matches
Mail list logo
