To test/install a new VM level, I'd use a secondlevel VM system, no
need to devote an LPAR to it. I still find it easier that one can use
the host level VM; the main reasons::
- to provide the network to be able to log on to the second-level VM:
-- no access to the HMC required to start it up
On Friday, 12/05/2008 at 08:34 EST, Rick Troth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You've already gotten great advice.
I would add that you do NOT need to split your workload
between the tiers or zones. It was not completely clear to me,
but it sounded like that was one of your expected LPAR splits.
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 9:15 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Configuartion question
On Thursday, 12/04/2008 at 09:00 EST, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are moving toward taking our POC into production
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Configuartion question
On Friday, 12/05/2008 at 08:34 EST, Rick Troth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You've already gotten great advice.
I would add that you do NOT need to split your workload
between the tiers or zones. It was not completely clear to me
Hi
We are moving toward taking our POC into production. This workload is
moving from Solaris running UNIX. The environment is 3 zone
architecture. Our client's business requirements calls for this 3 zone
environment to remain separated. It requires UAL5 security level.
To this end we have
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM] Configuartion question
Hi
We are moving toward taking our POC into production. This workload is moving
from Solaris running UNIX. The environment is 3 zone architecture. Our client's
business requirements calls for this 3 zone environment to remain
cooperation.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 5:57 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM] Configuartion question
Hi
We are moving toward taking
