Re: FCXPER315A

2008-06-10 Thread Alan Ackerman
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 22:34:06 -0500, Alan Ackerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ERICA.COM wrote: We don't run PTK, we run ESAMON. But we have seen similar messages. I'm guessing that either your monitor shared segments are too small or t he user connecting to the monitor segment needs a greater SHARE

Re: FCXPER315A

2008-06-05 Thread Eginhard Jaeger
Original Message - From: Stricklin, Raymond J [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:12 PM Subject: FCXPER315A We recently began, under unknown circumstances, receiving this exception from PTK on one VM LPAR (z800, V5R3): FCXPER315A Cl1 time

Re: FCXPER315A

2008-06-05 Thread Eginhard Jaeger
We recently began, under unknown circumstances, receiving this exception from PTK on one VM LPAR (z800, V5R3): FCXPER315A Cl1 time slice 1.444 exceeds limit 1.000 (Q1=21 Qx=24) ... We don't run PTK, we run ESAMON. But we have seen similar messages. I'm guessing that either your monitor

Re: FCXPER315A

2008-06-04 Thread Alan Ackerman
On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 14:12:00 -0700, Stricklin, Raymond J raymond.j.strick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We recently began, under unknown circumstances, receiving this exception from PTK on one VM LPAR (z800, V5R3): FCXPER315A Cl1 time slice 1.444 exceeds limit 1.000 (Q1=21 Qx=24) We received

FCXPER315A

2008-06-03 Thread Stricklin, Raymond J
We recently began, under unknown circumstances, receiving this exception from PTK on one VM LPAR (z800, V5R3): FCXPER315A Cl1 time slice 1.444 exceeds limit 1.000 (Q1=21 Qx=24) We received it (with slightly different numbers) once every ten minutes for about a month, when it stopped under