How to avoid ATTACHED TO/DETACHED msgs?

2010-06-01 Thread Dieltiens Geert
Hi, We do quite a lot of ATTACH and DETACH of tapedevices. The problem is that with each ATTACH or DETACH, a msg is sent to the system-operator machine (usually OPERATOR). They look like this: TAPE ATTACHED TO userid BY userid TAPE DETACHED userid BY userid, ... These

Re: How to avoid ATTACHED TO/DETACHED msgs?

2010-06-01 Thread Rich Smrcina
Geert, Try the SILENTLY command. On 06/01/2010 08:34 AM, Dieltiens Geert wrote: Hi, We do quite a lot of ATTACH and DETACH of tapedevices. The problem is that with each ATTACH or DETACH, a msg is sent to the system-operator machine (usually OPERATOR). They look like this: TAPE

Re: How to avoid ATTACHED TO/DETACHED msgs?

2010-06-01 Thread Dieltiens Geert
Rich, In 1 word: perfect. Thanks, Geert. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Rich Smrcina Sent: dinsdag 1 juni 2010 15:46 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: How to avoid ATTACHED TO/DETACHED msgs? Geert, Try

Re: How to avoid ATTACHED TO/DETACHED msgs?

2010-06-01 Thread Jim Bohnsack
There are a lot of messages that go to SYSOPER that are only needed in a problem solving situation. I use Programmable Operator or PROP to log all the messages, responding to what needs to be responded when no human operator needs to reply, and then displaying what is useful information on