Re: Linux ignoring SIGNAL SHUTDOWN

2006-10-25 Thread Rob van der Heij
On 10/24/06, Fred Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I do a runlevel command on linux I get unknown as the response. If I set the runlevel to 3 via init 3, then SIGNAL SHUTDOWN guestname works properly. I recall that during installation it was fairly easy to overlook the step to restart the

Re: Linux ignoring SIGNAL SHUTDOWN

2006-10-23 Thread Fred Schmidt
How much time are you giving it to shutdown? Steve G. SET SHUTDOWN 30/* Time reserved for VM shut down (sec)*/ SET SIGNAL SHUTDOWN 300/* Time for guest shut down (sec) */ When I use SCIF to look at the linux log after issuing SIGNAL SHUTDOWN guestname, I see no shutdown

Re: Linux ignoring SIGNAL SHUTDOWN

2006-10-23 Thread Fred Schmidt
... more on this... If I do a runlevel command on linux I get unknown as the response. If I set the runlevel to 3 via init 3, then SIGNAL SHUTDOWN guestname works properly. Looking on the Linux-390 listserver, I see some similar problems there wi th systems without a run-level set, albeit for

Linux ignoring SIGNAL SHUTDOWN

2006-10-22 Thread Fred Schmidt
Hi fellow listers, My first post here, though I've been lurking a little while. I'm trying to get Linux guests to shut down after issuing a SIGNAL SHUTD OWN guestname on z/VM. I've updated /etc/inittab in Linux to make this happe n, as per the doco, but most of the time linux just ignores the