On 7/5/06, Kris Buelens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry Rob, DCSS stood (and still stands) for discontiguous saved segments
I stand corrected. Rob
There are more technical errors already in chapter 1.1
Example 1:
A segment is a 1 MB portion of real storage as defined
No:
A segment is a 1 MB portion of virtual storage ...
Example 2:
A DCSS enables z/VM to load such data into a designated segment of
physical memory
Wrong again, the pages
Rob van der Heij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you think the full name would be then? We have Named Saved
Systems and Discontiguous Shared Segments as far as I know.
Um, no. They've been Discontiguous Saved Segments since I was but a wee lad.
Remember, they're *saved* but not necessarily
On Tuesday, 07/04/2006 at 02:29 AST, Phil Smith III [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a good introduction to using DCSS and the XIP2 file system
Using Discontiguous Shared Segments and XIP2 Filesystems With Oracle
Database 10g on Linux for IBM System z
This is a good introduction to using DCSS and the XIP2 file system
Using Discontiguous Shared Segments and XIP2 Filesystems With Oracle
Database 10g on Linux for IBM System z
(http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247285.html)
Happy 4th of July, everyone.
DJ
