Re: Question to PAV on Minidisks

2009-07-21 Thread Florian Bilek
Hello Steve, Thanks for answering my question. I checked it out. The MINIOPT after a LINK statement does not work as MINIOPT is according to the CP Planning and Administration guide an extension to the MDISK direct ory statement. Furthermore it cannot be coded in a PROFILE statement in the C P

Question to PAV on Minidisks

2009-07-20 Thread Florian Bilek
Dear all, I would like to know how I can get the PAV addresses for a Minidisk that is linked to a z/LINUX guest. I have following directory statement(s): USER CLONSET1 1G 2G G INCLUDE LNXPROF MDISK 0201 3390 00011 3390 VMXX01 MR RW WP MP MINIOPT PAVALIAS 1201 ... Now I link

Re: Question to PAV on Minidisks

2009-07-20 Thread Steve Wilkins
Date: 07/20/2009 12:59 PM Subject:Question to PAV on Minidisks

Re: PAV and minidisks...

2009-07-02 Thread Kris Buelens
I don't have a full answer to your question. But I want to avoid a misconception: - mutipathing in z Architecture means a device can be reached by more than one path, most often this means more than one CHPID leads to the device, and each CHPID is connected to a different controlunit.

Re: PAV and minidisks...

2009-07-02 Thread RPN01
Your response verifies what I¹d thought was happening, but doesn¹t address the whole ³multiple writable minidisk² quandary. I¹m considering something like the following: USER LINUXGUEST MDISK 391 3390 1500 500 VOL001 MW LINK * 391 1391 MW LINK * 391 2391 MW Which would give me three virtual

Re: PAV and minidisks...

2009-07-02 Thread Kris Buelens
The simple MW approach is surely wrong, it will not create a PAV environment: Linux will think it has 3 different devices, accidents will happen. MDC will avoid the IO; Control Unit cache hit is still IO as concerned for the z Series, but here PAV would help. AFAIK, PAV will not help if the

Re: PAV and minidisks...

2009-07-02 Thread RPN01
Thank you Kris; I think that¹s the piece I was looking for. :) -- Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~. RO-OE-5-55 200 First Street SW/V\ 507-284-0844 Rochester, MN 55905 /( )\ -^^-^^ In theory, theory and

Re: PAV and minidisks...

2009-07-02 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Kris Buelenskris.buel...@gmail.com wrote: The simple MW approach is surely wrong, it will not create a PAV environment: Linux will think it has 3 different devices, accidents will happen. You're wrong. A very simple experiment could have shown you that:

Re: PAV and minidisks...

2009-07-02 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:52 PM, RPN01nix.rob...@mayo.edu wrote: Before I put something huge together to test this, I thought I’d pass it by all the experts. Too bad they must all have responded to you off-list.. I would have loved to see a concise answer. But failing that, let me give it a

PAV and minidisks...

2009-06-30 Thread RPN01
Before I put something huge together to test this, I thought I¹d pass it by all the experts. Linux has the ability to multipath, and z/VM supports multipathing via PAV. There¹s lots of documentation and studies showing that you can attach / dedicate the PAV addresses to a Linux LPAR or guest, and