Re: Question for old-timers

We're going to be retiring soon-I'm first :-D Are you sure of that? (The I'm first bit, that is.) :-) Regards, Richard Schuh

Re: Question for old-timers

I expect to be leaving, at least from full time work, sometime in August. I do expect to work part time from home, since I hardly ever have to touch the real computer, so I'm not going to be quite retired. I love being a VM sysprog and don't want to just logoff one day and never see a VM

Question for old-timers

We're doing some work on a 2nd level MVS system for use at a D/R site and the MVS sysprog wanted to get some printed output. I figured that the easiest way was to have the 2nd lvl MVS system print to the default VM 1403 printer. Easy for me to say!! On the MVS side of the house, they needed

Re: Question for old-timers

@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Question for old-timers We're doing some work on a 2nd level MVS system for use at a D/R site and the MVS sysprog wanted to get some printed output. I figured that the easiest way was to have the 2nd lvl MVS system print to the default VM 1403 printer. Easy for me to say

Re: Question for old-timers

@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 06/10/2008 04:00 PM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Question for old-timers We're doing some work on a 2nd level MVS system for use at a D/R site and the MVS sysprog wanted to get some printed

Re: Question for old-timers

cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] ARK.EDU Subject Question for old-timers

Re: Question for old-timers

: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Bohnsack Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 1:00 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Question for old-timers We're doing some work on a 2nd level MVS system for use at a D/R site and the MVS sysprog wanted to get some

Re: Question for old-timers

Thanks everyone who responded. The 2821 is the winner. The number of responses kind of goes along with an observation I've made at SHARE and have mentioned to IBM. That observation is that we mainframe sysprog types are getting old. We're going to be retiring soon-I'm first :-D The

Re: Question for old-timers

No worries, Jim... I have plenty of time to enjoy the fun. Jim Bohnsack wrote: Thanks everyone who responded. The 2821 is the winner. The number of responses kind of goes along with an observation I've made at SHARE and have mentioned to IBM. That observation is that we mainframe sysprog