We're going to be retiring soon-I'm first :-D
Are you sure of that? (The I'm first bit, that is.) :-)
Regards,
Richard Schuh
I expect to be leaving, at least from full time work, sometime in
August. I do expect to work part time from home, since I hardly ever
have to touch the real computer, so I'm not going to be quite retired.
I love being a VM sysprog and don't want to just logoff one day and
never see a VM
We're doing some work on a 2nd level MVS system for use at a D/R site
and the MVS sysprog wanted to get some printed output. I figured that
the easiest way was to have the 2nd lvl MVS system print to the default
VM 1403 printer. Easy for me to say!! On the MVS side of the house,
they needed
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Question for old-timers
We're doing some work on a 2nd level MVS system for use at a D/R site
and the MVS sysprog wanted to get some printed output. I figured that
the easiest way was to have the 2nd lvl MVS system print to the default
VM 1403 printer. Easy for me to say
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
06/10/2008 04:00 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Question for old-timers
We're doing some work on a 2nd level MVS system for use at a D/R site
and the MVS sysprog wanted to get some printed
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ARK.EDU Subject
Question for old-timers
: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim
Bohnsack
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 1:00 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Question for old-timers
We're doing some work on a 2nd level MVS system for use at a D/R site
and the MVS sysprog wanted to get some
Thanks everyone who responded. The 2821 is the winner.
The number of responses kind of goes along with an observation I've made
at SHARE and have mentioned to IBM. That observation is that we
mainframe sysprog types are getting old. We're going to be retiring
soon-I'm first :-D
The
No worries, Jim... I have plenty of time to enjoy the fun.
Jim Bohnsack wrote:
Thanks everyone who responded. The 2821 is the winner.
The number of responses kind of goes along with an observation I've made
at SHARE and have mentioned to IBM. That observation is that we
mainframe sysprog