: REXXCPS EXEC
I ran it on a 2817-742 (i.e. a z196):
rexxcps
- REXXCPS 2.1 -- Measuring REXX clauses/second -
REXX version is: REXX370 4.02 01 Dec 1998
System is: CMS
Averaging: 100 measures of 100 iterations Calibration
(empty DO): 0.1351 secs (average of 100
: Friday, June 10, 2011 12:58 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: REXXCPS EXEC
That's an interesting observation, but what does it have to do with
how much work a regular VM userid can get done using Rexx? That's the
whole point of REXXCPS.
Les
Mike Hammock wrote:
I have found in the past
Anyone object to my collecting the numbers posted and
sending them to Mike, all in *one* email!
Les
Les Koehler wrote:
I'm curious... Has anyone with real mainframe hardware (no emulation)
recently run REXXCPS that MFC wrote way back when?
See:
http://speleotrove.com/misc/rexxcpslist.html
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:25:05 -0400 Mike Hammock said:
I have found in the past that dividing the REXX CPS number by 1800 gives an
approximation(!) of the general MIPS rating.
Mike -
I'm running a FLEX-ES box that is knee capped at 18 MIPS. I added
your formula to the end of REXXCPS. Here are
is as meaningful
or meaningless as you want it to be.
Mike Hammock
--
From: Fran Hensler f...@zvm.sru.edu
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2011 7:45 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: REXXCPS EXEC
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:25:05 -0400 Mike Hammock
--
From: Les Koehler vmr...@tampabay.rr.com
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2011 5:05 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: REXXCPS EXEC
Actually, it is *most* useful to the individual user! I've used it over
the years to compare different pc systems and new releases of Rexx
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: REXXCPS EXEC
Actually, it is *most* useful to the individual user! I've used it
over the years to compare different pc systems and new releases of
Rexx on VM and ooRexx on the pc.
Before I retired from IBM, I used it regularly to give me an idea of
how the customer
I'm curious... Has anyone with real mainframe hardware (no
emulation) recently run REXXCPS that MFC wrote way back when?
See:
http://speleotrove.com/misc/rexxcpslist.html
for his collection of data.
If you've never seen REXXCPS, there's a link to it at the
top of the page. Just remove the
(not that I'm ever likely to
see one of those).
Peter
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of Les Koehler
Sent: June 10, 2011 06:18
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: REXXCPS EXEC
I'm curious... Has anyone with real mainframe hardware
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] REXXCPS EXEC
Well, I just tried it on our z9 BC E01:
rexxcps
- REXXCPS 2.1 -- Measuring REXX clauses/second -
REXX version is: REXX370 4.02 01 Dec 1998
System is: CMS
Averaging: 100 measures of 100 iterations
Calibration (empty DO
I ran it on a 2817-742 (i.e. a z196):
rexxcps
- REXXCPS 2.1 -- Measuring REXX clauses/second -
REXX version is: REXX370 4.02 01 Dec 1998
System is: CMS
Averaging: 100 measures of 100 iterations
Calibration (empty DO): 0.1351 secs (average of 100)
Spooling trace NOTERM
Hayden bjhay...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 10:12 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: REXXCPS EXEC
I ran it on a 2817-742 (i.e. a z196):
rexxcps
- REXXCPS 2.1 -- Measuring REXX clauses/second -
REXX version is: REXX370 4.02 01 Dec 1998
System is: CMS
Averaging: 100
On Friday, 06/10/2011 at 10:25 EDT, Mike Hammock m...@hammocktree.us
wrote:
Just remember that REXXCPS is a single thread; it can only test a single
processor/core. If you have a multi-processor system you have to
multiple
by the number of processors and adjust for N-way interference.
I.e.
expressed herein are mine alone, not my employer's.
Les Koehler vmr...@tampabay.rr.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
06/10/2011 05:18 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
REXXCPS
a multi-processor system you have to
multiple by the number of processors and adjust for N-way interference.
Mike Hammock
--
From: Bruce Hayden bjhay...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 10:12 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: REXXCPS
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: REXXCPS EXEC
That's an interesting observation, but what does it have to do with how
much work a regular VM userid can get done using Rexx? That's the whole
point of REXXCPS.
Les
Mike Hammock wrote:
I have found in the past that dividing the REXX CPS number by 1800
On Friday, 06/10/2011 at 01:47 EDT, Mike Hammock m...@hammocktree.us
wrote:
Of course,
pretty soon we may have to start using BIPS (Billions of .). Let's
see,
what word can we find that starts with B that means Meaningless?
(yawn)
(scratch) (scratch)
I vote for Beaningless. It even
Isn't that called bull?
Lloyd
- Original Message
From: Mike Hammock m...@hammocktree.us
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Sent: Fri, June 10, 2011 1:46:05 PM
Subject: Re: REXXCPS EXEC
Of course, pretty soon we may have to start using BIPS (Billions of .).
Let's see, what word
Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 2:22 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: REXXCPS EXEC
On Friday, 06/10/2011 at 01:47 EDT, Mike Hammock m...@hammocktree.us
wrote:
Of course,
pretty soon we may have to start using BIPS
On 6/10/2011 at 01:46 PM, Mike Hammock m...@hammocktree.us wrote:
Let's see,
what word can we find that starts with B that means Meaningless?
Bogus? Bogo?
Mark Post
20 matches
Mail list logo
