System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu]on
Behalf Of Tyler Koyl
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 6:31 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SSL Server on z/VM 5.4 RSU 802
Thanks. Thats was it. I found the enablement PTFs and installed them. This is a
real PITA. From having to figure out that ssl
My next question is whether I should be going with Static SSL or Dynamic SSL/TLS
connections? I have setup the Static SSL for Telnet by adding the following to
my TCPIP Profile:
AUTOLOG
SSLSERV 0
FTPSERVE 0
ENDAUTOLOG
PORT
20 TCP FTPSERVE NOAUTOLOG ; FTP SERVER
21 TCP
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu]on
Behalf Of Tyler Koyl
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 1:17 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SSL Server on z/VM 5.4 RSU 802 - Static SSL vs Dynamic
SSL\TLS
My next question is whether I should
ib...@listserv.uar
K.EDU Subject
Re: SSL Server on z/VM 5.4 RSU 802 -
Static SSL vs
Yes and add the line for 992 ..
or just change your 23 to 992 ..
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu]on
Behalf Of Tyler Koyl
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 1:52 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SSL Server on z/VM 5.4 RSU 802
On Wednesday, 03/11/2009 at 02:17 EDT, Tyler Koyl tyler.k...@viterra.ca
wrote:
My next question is whether I should be going with Static SSL or Dynamic
SSL/TLS
connections?
That depends on your client capability. Some older telnet clients can't
negotiate a secure connection.
PORT
23
z/VM Operating cc
System
ib...@listserv.uarSubject
K.EDU Re: SSL Server on z/VM 5.4 RSU
I don't know.. do you have the SSL enabling PTF's on?
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu]on
Behalf Of Tyler Koyl
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 4:31 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: SSL Server on z/VM 5.4 RSU 802
Testing out z/VM
K.EDU Subject
Re: SSL Server on z/VM 5.4 RSU 802
03/10/2009 03:34 PM
Chocolates!! What Chocolates?
Comes with the paid support option.
You have to settle for cinnamon rolls if you just mooch the free
version...
-- db
Hi Brian. I'm just testing SSL for a client and I used SSLSERV Debian from Sine
Nomine Associates. Very small foot print. All tailored. DDR restore and go.
Also recovers well after someone forced it off.
Hans Rempel
-- Original Message --
From:
Only SuSE and RH are officially supported by IBM. Both are not
particularly small. We provide a small appliance configuration that
seems to meet some people's needs.
I second this recommendation. Sine Nomine's SSLSERV has worked wonderfull
y
since I put it in. As indicated, this is a DDR restore and run distributi
on.
No package selection, no maintenance needed for the linux operating syste
m.
Then you have to add the IBM VMSSL stuff on top and then add a
I can recommend the SSL appliance thingy that Sine Nomine Associates
offers...it works well, installs easily via DDR, and comes with a nice
box of assorted chocolates.
DJ
Brian Ferguson wrote:
Folks,
Anybody have any suggestions as to the distro to use for the SSL server
for TCPIP?
Tom,
Did you get chocolates too?
Thomas Kern wrote:
I second this recommendation. Sine Nomine's SSLSERV has worked wonderfull
y
since I put it in. As indicated, this is a DDR restore and run distributi
on.
No package selection, no maintenance needed for the linux operating syste
m.
Then you
Did you get chocolates too?
You can also choose the coupon for cinnamon rolls. Personally, I recommend
the rolls. Chocolate is so yesterday. 8-)
-- db
I didn't know I was supposed to get chocolates with SSLSERV. They might h
ave
made my certificate problems more bareable.
/Tom
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:57:27 -0600, Rich Smrcina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot
e:
Tom,
Did you get chocolates too?
Thomas Kern wrote:
I second this recommendation. Sine
Sent: February 1, 2007 2:56 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SSL Server for z/VM
I didn't know I was supposed to get chocolates with SSLSERV. They might h=
ave
made my certificate problems more bareable.
/Tom
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:57:27 -0600, Rich Smrcina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot=
e
18 matches
Mail list logo
