Re: This may interest some.

2006-05-28 Thread Alan Altmark
On Friday, 05/26/2006 at 08:16 EST, Gary Eheman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I laughed when I read this. It appears they assert (repeatedly) copyright on > nothing, too. > > Someone shared with me once that a load module on z/OS for this C program > contains not fewer than 10 IBM copyright stat

Re: This may interest some.

2006-05-26 Thread Ray Mullins
Those copyright statements are in LE modules. Since C under z/OS is LE-enabled, it establishes an LE environment, which includes abend intercepts, etc. I just did a test on z/OS 1.7, and there are only 2 copyrights, in CEESTART and CEEBINIT. Of course, since the example is actually a subrout

Re: This may interest some.

2006-05-26 Thread Gary Eheman
On Thu, 25 May 2006 09:31:45 -0500, Lucius, Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Oh well. I guess IBM owns everything... :-) Actually, since no copyri ght was >attached to the article, I guess Alfred was within his rights to use it freely, >but to claim ownership That just seems wrong. > >

Re: This may interest some.

2006-05-25 Thread Rick Troth
Need to deliver such patches in a format that can be fed to 'patch'. IBM's patches against the kernel source work really well. Try that. -- R;

Re: This may interest some.

2006-05-25 Thread Lucius, Leland
Quoting Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thursday, 05/25/2006 at 07:03 ZE2, Rob van der Heij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On 5/25/06, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > You may not 1) use, copy, modify or distribute the Program except as > > > > provided in this Agreemen

Re: This may interest some.

2006-05-25 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 05/25/2006 at 07:03 ZE2, Rob van der Heij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/25/06, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > You may not 1) use, copy, modify or distribute the Program except as > > > provided in this Agreement; > > > Please post only your patches. Thanks. >

Re: This may interest some.

2006-05-25 Thread Dave Wade
--- Leland Lucius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Please post only your patches. Thanks. > > > Okay, I'll pull them off the site. Honestly though, > as long as you don't > hit PF12 (and PF2 I think), the original download > should work. It worked > for me on Windows and Mac OS... > I won

Re: This may interest some.

2006-05-24 Thread Leland Lucius
> > Please post only your patches. Thanks. > Okay, I'll pull them off the site. Honestly though, as long as you don't hit PF12 (and PF2 I think), the original download should work. It worked for me on Windows and Mac OS... Leland

Re: This may interest some.

2006-05-24 Thread Rob van der Heij
On 5/25/06, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You may not 1) use, copy, modify or distribute the Program except as > provided in this Agreement; Please post only your patches. Thanks. What would one do with those patches? Not modify the program I hope ;-) Rob

Re: This may interest some.

2006-05-24 Thread Alan Altmark
Leland Lucious wrote: > > Leland, > > Could you post the corrected code somewhere? > > Dave. > > > So, tell me...should I worry about this or not? Aside from this being > "eval" software, anything in here that IBM will complain about if I put a > copy on my site? (I really doubt it, but they h

Re: This may interest some.

2006-05-24 Thread Leland Lucius
> > Leland, > Could you post the corrected code somewhere? > Dave. > Get the "fixed" jar files at: http://www.homerow.net/files/lXimple.jar http://www.homerow.net/files/lXimpleSrc.jar But, if I'm asked to remove them, I will do so and post a patch of what needs to be changed. Really, it was n

Re: This may interest some.

2006-05-24 Thread Leland Lucius
> > Leland, > Could you post the corrected code somewhere? > Dave. > > So, tell me...should I worry about this or not? Aside from this being "eval" software, anything in here that IBM will complain about if I put a copy on my site? (I really doubt it, but they have scary suits...) Internatio

Re: This may interest some.

2006-05-24 Thread Leland Lucius
Quoting Dave Wade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > --- Leland Lucius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 5/23/06 2:23 PM, "McKown, John" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > But I cannot get it to work. > > > > > I got it working on my Mac. Trust me...it needs > > work. :-) > > > > But, it's surprisi

Re: This may interest some.

2006-05-23 Thread Dave Wade
--- Leland Lucius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/23/06 2:23 PM, "McKown, John" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > But I cannot get it to work. > > > I got it working on my Mac. Trust me...it needs > work. :-) > > But, it's surprisingly very little code and could be > improved. It does us

Re: This may interest some.

2006-05-23 Thread Leland Lucius
On 5/23/06 2:23 PM, "McKown, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But I cannot get it to work. > I got it working on my Mac. Trust me...it needs work. :-) But, it's surprisingly very little code and could be improved. It does use a class that is nowhere to be found and after disabling the code

Re: This may interest some.

2006-05-23 Thread McKown, John
But I cannot get it to work. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and p