On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Schuh, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's say that total amount of virtual storage is the main issue, with
everything else relegated to the status of being inconsequential.
The limit is on active virtual memory in the system. As Bill Holder
says, it's
: Thursday, August 21, 2008 1:54 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM 5.2 and the 2GB Line
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:57:22 -0700, Schuh, Richard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot=
e:
I have been unable to come up with the magic search argument to get
this=
list to spit out the answer
-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Holder
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 1:54 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM 5.2 and the 2GB Line
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:57:22 -0700, Schuh, Richard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot=
e:
I have been unable
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:57:22 -0700, Schuh, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot
e:
I have been unable to come up with the magic search argument to get this
list to spit out the answer to the question, What is the total GB of
virtual storage, the sum of the VM sizes, can z/VM 5.2 handle without
running
