Subject: Re: SFTP versus FTPS
On 7/23/2010 at 04:39 PM, Edward M Martin emar...@aultman.com
wrote:
Plus I have some Opie that indicates that they want SFTP and
. SFTP, for our purposes here at name removed , is for Implicit
SSL
connections. FTPS, is for SSH connections which we don't accept
...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 5:11 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFTP versus FTPS
On Friday, 07/23/2010 at 04:41 EDT, Edward M Martin
emar...@aultman.com
wrote:
Ok I need some comments and guidance. FTP using the SSH is not what
we
want, I
But given that a lot of people don't believe or know that FTP is
secure (they live in the distant past), they feel free to use
sftp and ftps and 'secure ftp' interchangeably. I even saw a
web browser incorrectly process an ftp:// URL, using binary
transfers for text data, on the bogus
be ordered. It is part of the OpenSSH port
( 5655-M23). It is free. This version of sftp only support z/OS UNIX
files.
(It is amazing that the simple definition of SFTP versus FTPS can cause
me so much grief on a Friday afternoon at 16:20. And I am leaving so
expect a late response.)
Here
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Edward M Martin
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 3:39 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: SFTP versus FTPS
Hello Everyone,
Ok I need some comments and guidance. FTP using the SSH is not what we want, I
believe.
We want FTP/SSL or FTPS (implicit SSL). Which
On 7/23/2010 at 04:39 PM, Edward M Martin emar...@aultman.com wrote:
Plus I have some Opie that indicates that they want SFTP and
. SFTP, for our purposes here at name removed , is for Implicit SSL
connections. FTPS, is for SSH connections which we don't accept at all
in fact.
They've
On Friday, 07/23/2010 at 04:41 EDT, Edward M Martin emar...@aultman.com
wrote:
Ok I need some comments and guidance. FTP using the SSH is not what we
want, I
believe.
That is called sftp and is what the IBM Ported Tools gives you.
We want FTP/SSL or FTPS (implicit SSL). Which from my
