This appliance can connect to a VSWITCH?
Yes. It will tolerate both layer 2 and layer 3 VSWITCHes.
And how will my
SMTP talk to it? Over CTC? HS?
What we suggest for front-ending these older VM TCP services is that you get
another IP address from your networking folks (just one is
Well, things have gotten a bit confused, and
they DO think it's my fault. They said that their server
is enabled for anonymous SMTP, but that I am accessing
the wrong server!
The SMTP CONFIG file says
IPMAILERADDRESS ALL our.network.mailer.name
This name is actually a balancer, which
On Sunday, 03/13/2011 at 12:39 EDT, Shimon Lebowitz shim...@iname.com
wrote:
Well, things have gotten a bit confused, and
they DO think it's my fault. They said that their server
is enabled for anonymous SMTP, but that I am accessing
the wrong server!
The SMTP CONFIG file says
On Friday, 03/11/2011 at 05:38 EST, Shimon Lebowitz shim...@iname.com
wrote:
As I see it, there are now 3 possibilities:
a) they reallow anonymous SMTP access globally
b) they allow SMTP access to z/VM's server
c) they prefer authentication, give me a valid set of credentials,
and I use
Hi,
This morning we have a new problem in the z/VM SMTP server. Email to the
local network is failing, with this message appearing in the SMTP console:
3 530 5.7.1 Client was not authenticated
Could someone please explain:
a) what this actually means (it didn't use to happen)?
b) how do I solve
, March 10, 2011 5:10 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: SMTP authentication?
Hi,
This morning we have a new problem in the z/VM SMTP server. Email to the
local network is failing, with this message appearing in the SMTP
console:
3 530 5.7.1 Client was not authenticated
Could someone please
On Thursday, 03/10/2011 at 06:22 EST, Shimon Lebowitz shim...@iname.com
wrote:
Hi,
This morning we have a new problem in the z/VM SMTP server. Email to the
local network is failing, with this message appearing in the SMTP
console:
3 530 5.7.1 Client was not authenticated
Could someone
Thank you very much for the explanation.
The part about There is nothing you can do to fix it. takes the onus off
of me,
but I still need to get the network kiddies to fix what they broke.
I was wondering - is it really necessary for them to allow ALL anonymous
mail, or can it be selectively by
On Thursday, 03/10/2011 at 12:36 EST, David Boyes dbo...@sinenomine.net
wrote:
It?s something that more and more servers are starting to do (thanks to
the
spam). The quickest solution to this problem is to set up a Linux guest
on your
VM system and use that as a proxy. All of the Linux
David,
Thanks very much!! That sounds great.
Here, everyone has already gone home for the weekend (we work Sun-Thu),
but I will raise the possibility with the network folks on Sunday morning.
I hope this is not based on a very new linux. I see that the new
ones cannot run on my somewhat
But it's so much more fun! Sheesh ... you have a lot of self restraint, Alan.
Don't silently take the problem away from them and solve it on your own.
...
(2) They don't learn anything
...
[Riddler stops Two Face killing Batman]
Don't kill him! If you kill him, he won't
On 3/10/11 12:59 PM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I was going to mention that as a solution, but I would suggest that
Shimon
first take the issue to his network people and let them decide what they
want to do. If their answer is to use a relay and they want it on
zLinux,
then
I hope this is not based on a very new linux. I see that the new
ones cannot run on my somewhat antiquated z890.
It should work fine on a z890 (it was built on a 7060-H70 and tested on a z800,
so it should be OK). Give me a few days to package it up and put it somewhere
for you. It can also
There are never any fixes to apply. All you have to do is reboot them.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of David Boyes
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 2:01 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SMTP authentication
14 matches
Mail list logo
