Martha,
You were planning a longer test over the Easter weekend. How did it go?
...RSU 0502 for z/VM 5.2 was just released... Arg! A victim of my own
bad reading. I saw 5202RSU and typed 0502.
It is z/VM 5.2 RSU LVL 0601 and/or 5202RSU. Clear, eh? Depending on how
you look at it, it is either the 1st RSU of 2006 (0601) or Verion 5 release
2 RSU #2 (5.2 + #02 ==
What other vendor software?
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 4:22 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Update on z/VM 5.2.0 problem
Then this is strictly a DIAG 10 problem
Hello Everyone,
I have been following this thread with great interest.
We are currently on z/VM 4.3
We are (like most everyone else) 24/7 and can not afford any
known problems/errors that could/may happen.
Is this Z/VM 5.2.0 problem associated with a particular
On Tuesday, 03/28/2006 at 11:29 EST, Edward M. Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am leaning toward the 5.1 upgrade. With the 5.2 at second
level.
Now comes the MP3000 to z/xxx box as they have not told me which one
yet.
We are getting prices on everything.
The hospital area is an
On Tuesday, 03/28/2006 at 12:06 EST, Edward M. Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I could upgrade to z/VM 4.4 on the MP3000, get over to the
z/xxx box and then upgrade to z/VM 5.1. Right?
Or z/VM 5.2.
Right. A lot depends on exactly which box you get. z/VM 4.3 supports
z800/z900. z/VM
I used spxtape DUMP tape from a z/VM 3.1 system. During my testing I found out
even files dumped from spxtape z/VM 5.2 caused the same problem. IBM ask me to
test a fix which resolved the problem. An official fix should be out soon.
Hans
Subject: Re: Update on z/VM 5.2.0 problem
RSU 0502 for z/VM 5.2 was just released - I would recommend that to
start
with. There have been a number of HTT001 abends due to various page
translations too that you should also get the fixes for. Some
additional
ones I presented in our Early Experiences
: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim Vincent
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 11:00 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Update on z/VM 5.2.0 problem
RSU 0502 for z/VM 5.2 was just released - I would recommend that to
start
with. There have been
On Tuesday, 03/28/2006 at 11:05 PST, Austin, Alyce (CIV)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because of the growing pains with 5.2, is support for z/VM 4.4 going
to be extended beyond 9/06?
Alyce, what you aren't hearing about are all the sites that have z/VM 5.2
running with *no* problems; as stable as
Yes, there are a *few* sites that are having
stability problems,
Uh huh. And they're the whiney
sites. That's right -- you know who you are!! :-)
Mike (having a Chuckie moment)
Walter
Hewitt Associates
The opinions expressed herein are mine
alone, not my employer's.
The IBM z/VM Operating
immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 13:52
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Update on z/VM
On Tuesday, 03/28/2006 at 04:05 CST, Mike Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes, there are a *few* sites that are having stability problems,
Uh huh. And they're the whiney sites. That's right -- you know who
you are!!
:-)
I wondered where the ol' Chuckster has been. Now I know.
Of Mike Walter
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 2:06
PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Update on z/VM 5.2.0
problem
Yes, there
are a *few* sites that are having stability problems,
Uh huh. And they're the whiney sites. That's right -- you know who you
are!! :-)
Mike (having a Chuckie
Geeezztake a day off and the discussion gets completely out of control!
First, no one was whining as far as I can tell. We all have pretty high
expectations of VM now, and more often than not, it meets them.
I'm not complaining about z/VM 5.2.0 in any way. We signed up for the early
Thanks, Martha. Running DB2 for VM with plenty of other load is the main
exposure, as the behavior which triggers the problem (contact me directly
if
you want the gory details) is quite unusual and unique to DB2, as far as
we
know. There's a small possibility of hitting it while running a
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 16:11:09 -0600, Bill Holder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot
e:
There are two aspects of the problem, only one of which is directly Diag
nose
x'10' / release processing related. The other aspect has to do with
handling of the logically 0 page state created by Diagnose x'10', when
the
: Update on z/VM 5.2.0 problem
There are two aspects of the problem, only one of which is directly Diag
n=
ose
x'10' / release processing related. The other aspect has to do with
handling of the logically 0 page state created by Diagnose x'10', when
=
the
HPMA function is enabled and substantial
18 matches
Mail list logo
