To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: VM2.3 IN$FILE 3174
I thought one of the 3174 configuration questions had to do with
CUT vs DFT. I think you have to define the
port(s) as DFT (unless that's what question 125 does, in that case,
never mind
cc
Subject
Re: VM2.3 IN$FILE 3174
Hi Jan,
It's been years since I've worked
with IND$FILE, so take this advice with a grain of salt, but try changing
the packet size of the IND$FILE to 256 bytes. I vaguely recall a
problem that I had where a transfer would just hang
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: VM2.3 IN$FILE 3174
Hello
Jan Canavan,
I am basically agreeing with
Steve, but I think it is the other way around for your “(AST-3270
Coax-II-CUT Control Program Version 2.01”.
The DFT (distributive function terminals
I had a very interesting day working
with a 3174. The plan is to move from a 3274-41D to a 3174-01L. The
first part of the plan of making a copy of the already working configuration,
which went fine. (By the way, I walked into this shop. Everything
was already there, they just wanted copies
Title: Message
Hi
Jan,
It's
been years since I've worked with IND$FILE, so take this advice with a grain of
salt, but try changing the packet size of the IND$FILE to 256 bytes. I
vaguely recall a problem that I had where a transfer would just hang, that was
circumvented by drastically
Title: RE: VM2.3 IN$FILE 3174
Hello Jan Canavan,
I am basically agreeing with Steve, but I think it is the other way around for your (AST-3270 Coax-II-CUT Control Program Version 2.01.
The DFT (distributive function terminals) did some of the file transfer and other controller functions
Jan,
I thought there was a file transfer
customization question on the 3174 that had no
counterpart on the 3274. I vaguely remember
something new on the 3174 that we had to answer
yes to in order to make IND$FILE work correctly
when we switched from 3274's ro
3174's. Unfortunately I
