WFH Tuesdays and Fridays
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Bill Munson
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 2:26 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VMRMSVM - z/VM Resource Manager
Terry,
I am not using SFS
System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 4:39 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VMRMSVM - z/VM Resource Manager
On Monday, 11/02/2009 at 02:15 EST, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
BTW, I am
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
10/30/2009 08:33 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: VMRMSVM - z/VM Resource Manager
Thanks Ed. I am not running SFS and I understand that VMRM requires the
config file to be under SFS control
Munson
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 11:09 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VMRMSVM - z/VM Resource Manager
Terry,
Nobody has said this but VMRMSVM does not need SFS to run like DFSMS
does.
But there is some documentation that says to use SFS if you are using
IBM
VM Director
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: VMRMSVM - z/VM Resource Manager
HI Bill,
So the CONFIG file for VMRMSVM does not need to be on SFS even if you
want the ability to change the configuration dynamically?
BTW, I am not using DIRMAINT or anything like that to administer the
Directory
On Monday, 11/02/2009 at 02:15 EST, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
BTW, I am not using DIRMAINT or anything like that to administer the
Directory I am using DIRECTXA is that considered IBM VM DIRECTOR?
No, DIRECTXA and IBM Systems Director (IBM Director) are
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 1:33 AM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
Thanks Ed. I am not running SFS and I understand that VMRM requires the
config file to be under SFS control is this correct? Also the only thing
that came on the A disk for the VMRMSVM user was
Operating System on behalf of Rob van der Heij
Sent: Sat 10/31/2009 6:01 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VMRMSVM - z/VM Resource Manager
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 1:33 AM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
Thanks Ed. I am not running SFS and I understand
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
Thanks Rob, In Velocity do you interact at all with VMRM in terms of seeing
the settings in the CONFIG file and such?
There's no interaction other than that both receive the same monitor
data from
Terry, I would ask if you use it AND HAVE VALIDATED RESULTS?
I've seen several sites install it during early days when there was no
contention. So no problems means it is working? But when there is
contention, the question is does it help when there is contention, or
does it force servers to
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 8:06 PM
Subject: VMRMSVM - z/VM Resource Manager
Hi,
I am looking at implementing VMRM. I was wondering if you use it and if it is
working as advertised? I want to mainly use it for managing the priority of my
different workloads running in z/Linux. I
and Fridays
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Ed Neidhardt
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 12:19 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VMRMSVM - z/VM Resource Manager
Terry,
I've been using it for around 10
:33 PM
To: 'Ed Neidhardt'; IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: RE: VMRMSVM - z/VM Resource Manager
Thanks Ed. I am not running SFS and I understand that VMRM requires the
config file to be under SFS control is this correct? Also the only
thing that came on the A disk for the VMRMSVM user
Hi,
I am looking at implementing VMRM. I was wondering if you use it and if
it is working as advertised? I want to mainly use it for managing the
priority of my different workloads running in z/Linux. I am familiar
with the goal concept from WLM on the z/OS side so I understand the
principle
14 matches
Mail list logo
