Rob van der Heij wrote:
>We recently looked at data from a similar configuration. The data was
>sufficient to explain why their Linux server ran about 10 times as
>slow as they anticipated. A factor of 3 could be helped by proper
>configuration, the rest was overhead in V/SIE basically.
>Linux is u
___
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 3:46 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Very Slow Linux Running Second Level z/VM
yes
--- On Tue, 10/21/08, Marcy Cortes
2, 2008 8:22 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Very Slow Linux Running Second Level z/VM
We had the 'exact' problem at our DR test in 07. After much research
and
discussion it was determined 'virtualization' beyond the 2nd level is
not
going to preform well. I believ
AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Very Slow Linux Running Second Level z/VM
We had the 'exact' problem at our DR test in 07. After much research
and
discussion it was determined 'virtualization' beyond the 2nd level is
not
going to preform well. I believe thats wh
We had the 'exact' problem at our DR test in 07. After much research and
discussion it was determined 'virtualization' beyond the 2nd level is not
going to preform well. I believe thats what Rob is explaining. This year
we ran our linux guest on their VM system. Ran GREAT! I believe there was
Howard Rifkind wrote:
>We are testing at our D/R site.
>We are running our z/VM under the D/R sites z/VM.
>yet when we bring up one Linux guest it is very very slow and nothing is
>showing up in any of the monitoring tools.
This doesn't help solve your problem, BUT ObAnecdote:
Back at Linuxcar
yes
--- On Tue, 10/21/08, Marcy Cortes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Marcy Cortes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Very Slow Linux Running Second Level z/VM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date: Tuesday, October 21, 2008, 9:04 PM
Is he on the eligible list? (ind queues)?
Marc
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 2:33 AM, Howard Rifkind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There isn't any paging at first level and almost no paging at second level
> yet when we bring up one Linux guest it is very very slow and nothing is
> showing up in any of the monitoring tools.
We recently looked at dat
Running Second Level z/VM
Hello all,
We are testing at our D/R site.
We are running our z/VM under the D/R sites z/VM.
z/VM, both first and second level running like gang busters along with one z/OS
and VSE guest, plus other minor z/VM user ids.
Processor is a z9 and the lpars are all weighted
fkind
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:34 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM] Very Slow Linux Running Second Level z/VM
Hello all,
We are testing at our D/R site.
We are running our z/VM under the D/R sites z/VM.
z/VM, both first and second level running like gang busters along wit
Hello all,
We are testing at our D/R site.
We are running our z/VM under the D/R sites z/VM.
z/VM, both first and second level running like gang busters along with one z/OS
and VSE guest, plus other minor z/VM user ids.
Processor is a z9 and the lpars are all weighted equally. At present
11 matches
Mail list logo
