Re: XEDIT and non-printables

2008-05-22 Thread Alan Altmark
Code page 924 gives the following result (text-only viewers may not display correctly): --- | | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F | | --- | 4 | â ä à á ã å ç ñ Ý . ( + | | 4 | | 5 | é ê ë è í î ï ì ß

XEDIT and non-printables

2008-05-20 Thread Ian S. Worthington
Whilst (carefully) xediting a file containing mixed printable and non-printable characters I've found that certain x'11' characters have been changed to x'40's. Any ideas what the cause might be would be most welcome. ian ... Ian S. Worthington, MBCS. me: http://isw.me.uk/ photos:

Re: XEDIT and non-printables

2008-05-20 Thread Bob Bates
cooperation. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian S. Worthington Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 9:48 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: XEDIT and non-printables Whilst (carefully) xediting a file containing mixed printable and non

Re: XEDIT and non-printables

2008-05-20 Thread Kris Buelens
: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian S. Worthington Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 9:48 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: XEDIT and non-printables Whilst (carefully) xediting a file containing mixed printable and non-printable characters I've found

Re: XEDIT and non-printables

2008-05-20 Thread Tony Thigpen
I have seen this before. The x'11' seems to be special 'sometimes'. I just tried it with x3270 and did not have a problem. The last time I hit it was many years ago about the time I was using either extra or a real 3270 device so I think it is hardware or emulator related. (I really think it

Re: XEDIT and non-printables

2008-05-20 Thread Wakser, David
: Re: XEDIT and non-printables I have seen this before. The x'11' seems to be special 'sometimes'. I just tried it with x3270 and did not have a problem. The last time I hit it was many years ago about the time I was using either extra or a real 3270 device so I think it is hardware or emulator

Re: XEDIT and non-printables

2008-05-20 Thread Kris Buelens
: XEDIT and non-printables I have seen this before. The x'11' seems to be special 'sometimes'. I just tried it with x3270 and did not have a problem. The last time I hit it was many years ago about the time I was using either extra or a real 3270 device so I think it is hardware or emulator related

Re: XEDIT and non-printables

2008-05-20 Thread Stephen Frazier
Checking my 3270 Reference Summary after blowing the dust off I see - x'11' is 'Set Buffer Address' - the next two bytes are the address on the screen where following characters are displayed. Kris Buelens wrote: Xedit will never send X'11' to a 3270 when present in data, everything below

Re: XEDIT and non-printables

2008-05-20 Thread Gillis, Mark
] On Behalf Of Stephen Frazier Sent: Wednesday, 21 May 2008 5:16 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: XEDIT and non-printables Checking my 3270 Reference Summary after blowing the dust off I see - x'11' is 'Set Buffer Address' - the next two bytes are the address on the screen where following

Re: XEDIT and non-printables

2008-05-20 Thread Thomas Kern
characters. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Frazier Sent: Wednesday, 21 May 2008 5:16 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: XEDIT and non-printables Checking my 3270 Reference Summary after blowing the dust off I see - x

Re: XEDIT and non-printables

2008-05-20 Thread Kris Buelens
and non-printables Checking my 3270 Reference Summary after blowing the dust off I see - x'11' is 'Set Buffer Address' - the next two bytes are the address on the screen where following characters are displayed. Kris Buelens wrote: Xedit will never send X'11' to a 3270 when present in data

Re: XEDIT and non-printables

2008-05-20 Thread Ian S. Worthington
Many thanks to all. Made appropriate changes to the profile and re-edited successfully this time. i