Thank you Alan, Miguel and David for your responses.
2) And, OTOH, will a non-routing OSA pass through traffic
aimed at an IP address which IS one of the HOME
addresses of a stack connected to the OSA,
even if that address is NOT an address on the OSA itself,
but on some other defined
On Tuesday, 02/17/2009 at 05:06 EST, Shimon Lebowitz shim...@iname.com
wrote:
OK, so now we know that in 5.3 VM does *not* register other
addresses with the OSA. So I seem to have a problem if
I want to continue to use the old address (10.1.5.2) to get to VM.
(Hmmm... could I fake-it by
addresses of one of the stacks
connected to that OSA? (And therefore all traffic
on the network not aimed at one of those addresses
will not be seen by the stacks using the OSA)?
2) And, OTOH, will a non-routing OSA pass through traffic
aimed at an IP address which IS one of the HOME
addresses
On 2/16/09 4:33 AM, Shimon Lebowitz shim...@iname.com wrote:
I have a few OSA questions please:
[snip]
Question 2 is important because we don't use DNS,
Fix this first:
1. Define a new VSWITCH for the new addresses.
2. Define a VSWITCH for the old addresses
3. Define a VNIC on
only.)
2) And, OTOH, will a non-routing OSA pass through traffic
aimed at an IP address which IS one of the HOME
addresses of a stack connected to the OSA,
even if that address is NOT an address on the OSA itself,
but on some other defined interface?
If the IP host registers all of its home
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 02/16/2009
08:02:37 AM:
From:
Alan Altmark/Endicott/i...@ibmus
2) And, OTOH, will a non-routing OSA pass through traffic
aimed at an IP address which IS one of the HOME
addresses of a stack connected to the OSA,
even
On Monday, 02/16/2009 at 11:53 EST, Miguel Delapaz/Endicott/i...@ibmus
wrote:
As of z/VM 5.3, the TCP/IP stack no longer registers all of it's HOME
addresses
in the OSA. We now only register IP addresses assigned to the OSA, IP
addresses which the OSA has assumed responsibility for due to
