On Thursday, 10/22/2009 at 10:41 EDT, Stephen Frazier
ste...@doc.state.ok.us wrote:
So SSI (zVM0 is HA (VMware) and Live Guest Relocation (zVM) is vmotion
(VMware).
I don't know what zVM0 is, so I can't answer your question.
The architecture is SSI or HA and LGR or vmotion is what you can do
Altmark
Sent: Fri 10/23/2009 1:10 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23
On Thursday, 10/22/2009 at 10:41 EDT, Stephen Frazier
ste...@doc.state.ok.us wrote:
So SSI (zVM0 is HA (VMware) and Live Guest Relocation (zVM) is vmotion
(VMware).
I don't
...@kable.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
10/23/2009 08:50 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23
Personally I wish people would quit
Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
10/23/2009 08:50 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23
Personally I wish people would quit trying to compare z/VM
When you must support both you need to always state which you are
referring to (zVM) or (VMware).
Scott Rohling wrote:
I just say zVM (or zed-VM) whenever referring to 'our' VM -- that
seems to keep everyone clear. And I don't refer to VMWare at all -
which keeps it even clearer ;-)
] On Behalf Of Mike Walter
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 7:37 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23
I also wish people would quit referring to vmWARE VM... It only
confuses those in the executive suite.
What's wrong with referring to VMware
, but it was no match for me in kickboxing.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 23:10
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct
On Friday, 10/23/2009 at 12:34 EDT, O'Brien, Dennis L
dennis.l.o'br...@bankofamerica.com wrote:
I don't know what zVM0 is, so I can't answer your question.
Reading the whole sentence, (zVM0 was meant to be (zVM). He just didn't
hold
the shift key down for the right paren. Yes, I know it
That sentence wasn't red, it was black. :-)(This must be Friday.)
Regards,
Richard Schuh
Thanks - I didn't notice the unmatched parens even though I
red the whole sentence.
On Friday 23 October 2009, Schuh, Richard wrote:
That sentence wasn't red, it was black. :-)(This must be Friday.)
...and not a moment too soon! :-)
Cheers,
Bob
--
Bob Woodside
Woodsway Consulting, Inc.
http://www.woodsway.com
And while we're debating correct terminology, remember that it's z/VM. The
slash is required: it's software. z/VM, z/OS, z/VSE, z/TPF, z/Architecture
(yeah, that's considered software). z10, z9, z900, z800, etc. -- hardware.
On Wednesday, 10/21/2009 at 12:36 EDT, Alain Benveniste
a.benveni...@free.fr wrote:
I'm not sure what should be understood by Single System Image ?
Could you give me a brief explanation of this meaning ?
A Single System Image will be a cluster of 2, 3, or 4 z/VM LPARs that has
the following
Alan
I suppose we could compare this to a z/OS complex.
And is it true to say that if I pay to use 30mips for one VM, i could
divide the work to 4 VM, each one having 30mips for the same price ?
Alain
Envoyé de mon iPhone
Le 22 oct. 2009 à 08:05, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com a
On VMware you can move a running virtual machine from one ESX machine to
another without the operating systems running on the virtual machine
knowing it.
There are many good ideas from zVM that have been copied by VMware. This
is an example going the other way - zVM is using a VMware idea.
Both
Many years ago at the University of Waterloo, multiple VM systems were
connected together in a Single System Image and running virtual machines
were moved from one physical system to another based on need. This is
nothing new. This is just finally coming out from IBM.
Thank you Romney.
/Tom Kern
On 10/22/09 4:03 PM, Stephen Frazier ste...@doc.state.ok.us wrote:
On VMware you can move a running virtual machine from one ESX machine to
another without the operating systems running on the virtual machine
knowing it.
There are many good ideas from zVM that have been copied by VMware. This
That Company was VM/CMS Unlimited, IIRC.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of David Boyes
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 1:43 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM 6.1 G.A
, October 22, 2009 3:56 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23
That Company was VM/CMS Unlimited, IIRC.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of David
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu]
On
==Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
==Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 4:56 PM
==To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
==Subject: Re: z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23
==
==That Company was VM/CMS Unlimited, IIRC.
==
==Regards,
==Richard Schuh
==
==
==
== -Original
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
10/22/2009 04:00 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23
Romney was with another outfit before VM/CMS
On Thursday, 10/22/2009 at 04:04 EDT, Stephen Frazier
ste...@doc.state.ok.us wrote:
Now zVM is adding vmotion from VMware, so they call it Single System
Image.
Actually, no. Single System Image is a cluster architecture. Live
Guest Relocation (which requires an SSI cluster) is just one of
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23
Until Romney does, Gerald Depass (and perhaps Romney) started Adesse.
Adesse had some pretty nifty products!
IIRC, Single System Image was Romney's idea, after he started
VM/CMS Unlimited.
It was the Thursday
Alan Altmark wrote:
On Thursday, 10/22/2009 at 04:04 EDT, Stephen Frazier
ste...@doc.state.ok.us wrote:
Now zVM is adding vmotion from VMware, so they call it Single System
Image.
Actually, no. Single System Image is a cluster architecture. Live
Guest Relocation (which requires an
The only z/VM 6.1 only items I found were:
1. Limited to z10 only
2. Prefetch guest data into processor cache
3. Closer integration with IBM Systems Director
So if that's all there is, why would anyone bother to install z/VM 6.1?
Alan Ackerman
Alan (dot) Ackerman (at) Bank of America (dot)
Alan Ackerman wrote:
The only z/VM 6.1 only items I found were:
1. Limited to z10 only
2. Prefetch guest data into processor cache
3. Closer integration with IBM Systems Director
So if that's all there is, why would anyone bother to install z/VM 6.1?
Alan Ackerman
Alan (dot) Ackerman
-mail and delete this message. Thank you for
your cooperation.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Alan Ackerman
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 11:43 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.comwrote:
On Tuesday, 10/20/2009 at 06:46 EDT, Marcy Cortes
marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
Did pricing change?
No.
One does wonder, Why the version number change?
On Wednesday, 10/21/2009 at 11:48 EDT, P S zosw...@gmail.com wrote:
One does wonder, Why the version number change?
The z10 Architectural Level Set.
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
10/21/2009 10:47 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
wrote
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Mike Walter
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 10:55 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23
I don't have any IBM inside
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
10/21/2009 11:10 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23
The only z/VM 6.1 only items I found were:
1. Limited to z10 only
2. Prefetch guest data into processor cache
3. Closer integration with IBM Systems Director
So if that's all there is, why would anyone
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
wrote:
On Tuesday, 10/20/2009 at 06:46 EDT, Marcy Cortes
marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
Did pricing
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Mike Walter mike.wal...@hewitt.comwrote:
SSI appears to provide a means of using communications architectures to
couple up to 4 (maximum: FOUR) z/VM systems into one Single System Image.
Heh. I remember when ISF (the same idea, badly done, on HPO) was
Subject
Re: z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23
Mike,
I'm not sure what should be understood by Single System Image ?
Could you give me a brief explanation of this meaning ?
The french guy
Alain
Le 21 oct. 2009 à 17:55, Mike Walter a écrit :
I don't have any IBM inside information
In case it slipped by, the G.A. announcement for a/VM 6.1 was posted
today, see (watch for URL wrap):
: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 3:31 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23
I cannot find much that is available only in z/VM 6.1. I looked through =
the items in the announcment letter, and most of them say they are
supported by PTF in z/VM 5.3
in kickboxing.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Marcy Cortes
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 15:46
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23
That's what I saw too.
Did
On Tuesday, 10/20/2009 at 06:46 EDT, Marcy Cortes
marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
Did pricing change?
No.
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott
39 matches
Mail list logo
