On Feb 4, 2008, at 4:24 PM, Janice McDonald wrote:
Yes, I realize that this test was for culicoides. But since, for
instance, Valurs low value (27) is not at all in sync with his fairly
severe symptoms, I am saying that they are caused by something other
than no-see-ums. And I wonder what it
On Feb 2, 2008, at 2:34 PM, Janice McDonald wrote:
What is the conclusion? We need to learn more about what causes the
symptoms.
I would say that these horses are reacting (or not) to something
other
than culicoides
nope. this first portion of the study was to test for culicoides
Yes, I realize that this test was for culicoides. But since, for
instance, Valurs low value (27) is not at all in sync with his fairly
severe symptoms, I am saying that they are caused by something other
than no-see-ums. And I wonder what it is.
Anneliese
oh I see... from what I
On Feb 2, 2008 5:34 PM, Janice McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
uh oh, maybe he is allergic to sand and i will have to send him to
wales :)
Or you could send him to New Brunswick..
:D
V
What is the conclusion? We need to learn more about what causes the
symptoms.
I would say that these horses are reacting (or not) to something other
than culicoides.
nope. this first portion of the study was to test for culicoides
only. This is the results to CULICOIDES. So now we
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 13:34:50 -0600, you wrote:
nope. this first portion of the study was to test for culicoides
only. This is the results to CULICOIDES. So now we find out next
test what they are further alergic to in addition.
That's what I meant - the horses that have low results for
On Feb 2, 2008 2:15 PM, Mic Rushen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's what I meant - the horses that have low results for Culicoides
but still show symptoms are more than likely reacting to something
else.
uh oh, maybe he is allergic to sand and i will have to send him to
wales :) But he has
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:38:44 -0500, you wrote:
What is the conclusion? We need to learn more about what causes the
symptoms.
I would say that these horses are reacting (or not) to something other
than culicoides.
Mic
Mic (Michelle) Rushen
Hi Janice and all:
Has anyone else participated in the SE study?
I participated with 5 horses: 4 imports and 1 domestic as a control.
The results make only partial sense as far as culicoides are concerned.
Itha: 61 makes sense - intermediate clinical symptoms (rubs mane and
tail), sore
The results make only partial sense as far as culicoides are concerned.
What REALLY seems odd to me is that Janice's Nasi - a four-year-old domestic
with NO symptoms - had a higher number than any of yours who are known
sufferers, except for Itha. Didn't he have something like 56, Janice?
On 1/31/08, Karen Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
haha funny about your bug allergy but not the pneumonia!! As for
Nasi, the way I read it, it says if a horse is in that intermediate
range and has no symptoms, he may have developed a tolerance over
time. I do know his dam has it, came down
The first phase of the Cornell Univ Vet School Sweet itch study
results are in. I will copy the results so you all will get to see
just what I know. I sent Tivar's bloodwork in as the one with Sweet
itch i suspected (he rubbed hair off and had lesions etc) and nasi as
the control horse, a horse
12 matches
Mail list logo
