Alexa
I noticed the lists were down and would normally have flagged it, as many
another organisation knows. I did not do so partly because of the usual problem
of where to flag it but more because what is the point? These are not so much
archives as current affairs. I can look at what has been
Hello All , Trimmed the cc-list a bit , as ietf-announce was in the
list .
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Ed Juskevicius wrote:
Attached please find a Microsoft Word and a PDF version of a proposed
revision to the IETF Trust's "Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents"
(TLP) policy.
IF M$ created
On an allied topic, I notice that a recent I-D - draft-ietf-sidr-arch-06.txt -
published March 9, 2009, had a running heading which included 'November 2008'.
Paranoid as I am, I immediately link this date to RFC5378 and the time when the
IETF Trust introduced the new rules for IPR.
Is there a conn
At 08:23 17-03-2009, Tom.Petch wrote:
On an allied topic, I notice that a recent I-D - draft-ietf-sidr-arch-06.txt -
published March 9, 2009, had a running heading which included 'November 2008'.
Paranoid as I am, I immediately link this date to RFC5378 and the
time when the
IETF Trust introduc
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-atlas-icm
Hi -
> From: "Tom.Petch"
> To: "Alexa Morris"
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 2:34 AM
> Subject: Re: Repair of Public Mail List Archives Complete
...
> But when I really need an archive, to see what was
> agreed in 2006, I have to get there day by day by painstaking day by tedious
> day
Randy Presuhn wrote:
Hi -
From: "Tom.Petch"
To: "Alexa Morris"
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 2:34 AM
Subject: Re: Repair of Public Mail List Archives Complete
...
But when I really need an archive, to see what was
agreed in 2006, I have to get there day by day by painstaking
The purpose of this message is to announce the start of a 30-day community
review period for a proposed revision to the IETF Trust's "Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents" (TLP) policy.
The intended purpose of this TLP revision is to delete the hard requirement
for copyright boilerplate tex
Hi Tom,
On 17/03/09 05:34 AM, Tom.Petch wrote:
Alexa
I noticed the lists were down and would normally have flagged it, as many
another organisation knows. I did not do so partly because of the usual problem
of where to flag it but more because what is the point? These are not so much
archives
