On 30/01/2012 05:20, Mike Jones wrote:
Thanks for your useful feedback, Alexey.
Hi Mike,
Below, I'll respond to each of your comments. I've also added the OAuth
working group to the thread, so they are aware of them as well and can
participate in the discussion.
About your first issue
I hope a T-Shirt will feature my favorite French hero Super Dupont
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superdupont
--Olaf
Olaf M. KolkmanNLnet Labs
http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/
signature.asc
I've been recommending this direction (that this is basically just more private
space, no magic) for some time, so I support the change.
However, I strongly believe that the document should formally update RFC1918,
not just 5735, especially now that it specifically says that in certain
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Olaf Kolkman o...@nlnetlabs.nl wrote:
I hope a T-Shirt will feature my favorite French hero Super Dupont
And, for myself, I think that Hubert Bonisseur de La Bath (AKA OSS
117) would be perfect proxy IETFer. I can imagine
the line at the mike now.
From: George, Wes wesley.geo...@twcable.com
I've been recommending this direction (that this is basically just more
private space, no magic)
Is that wise? I thought (IIRC, and maybe I'm spacing) the whole reason for
allocating this space was that 1918 space _couldn't_ easily be
From: Noel Chiappa [mailto:j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu]
Is that wise? I thought (IIRC, and maybe I'm spacing) the whole reason for
allocating this space was that 1918 space _couldn't_ easily be used for CGN
because there were too many conflicting usages.
[WEG] yes, but the general sense I got
I thought (IIRC, and maybe I'm spacing) the whole reason for
allocating this space was that 1918 space _couldn't_ easily be used for
CGN
because there were too many conflicting usages. So, now we're making
more 1918
space? This is a good idea... how? If we need more 1918 space, let's do
so
On 1/31/12 11:59 AM, George, Wes wrote:
From: Noel Chiappa [mailto:j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu]
Is that wise? I thought (IIRC, and maybe I'm spacing) the whole reason for
allocating this space was that 1918 space _couldn't_ easily be used for CGN
because there were too many conflicting usages.
From: Pete Resnick presn...@qualcomm.com
I'd hate for us to allocate space to CGNs only when it's obvious
that this can be used for a whole class of these sorts of things,
and can be used by other people who build sane equipment that
understands shared addresses can
Hi Pete,
On 2012-02-01 08:14, Pete Resnick wrote:
On 1/31/12 11:59 AM, George, Wes wrote:
From: Noel Chiappa [mailto:j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu]
Is that wise? I thought (IIRC, and maybe I'm spacing) the whole
reason for
allocating this space was that 1918 space _couldn't_ easily be used
for
In your previous mail you wrote:
I hope a T-Shirt will feature my favorite French hero Super Dupont
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superdupont
+1 (I should not have to explain why :-)
Thanks
francis.dup...@fdupont.fr
___
Ietf mailing list
On 28/01/12 3:02 PM, Rob Austein s...@hactrn.net wrote:
At Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:43:23 -0800, Terry Manderson wrote:
Apologies for my lack of attention to date on this topic, so speaking only
for myself here.
Similar apologies for not having answered this more promptly. Somehow
we missed
The bearer token protocol described in the document referenced in the
subject line is vulnerable to the following attack by a malicious
resource server.
There are two resource servers S1 and S2, S1 hosting a resource R1,
and S2 hosting a resource R2. Servers are not entitled to access
resources
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Real-time Inter-network Defense (RID)'
(draft-ietf-mile-rfc6045-bis-11.txt) as a Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange
Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Sean Turner and Stephen
Due to a scheduling conflict, the BEHAVE audio conference interim
meeting is being rescheduled. The previously-scheduled
February 3 interim meeting is cancelled.
NEW DATE AND TIME: Thursday, February 16, 7am-8:30am Pacific Standard
Time (San Francisco, GMT-08:00).
Agenda and audio conference
15 matches
Mail list logo