Abel,
It sounds like you're checking for TXT records of the form
_domainkey.{domain}.tw . I suspect strongly that the "misconfigured"
domains that you are seeing are the result of wildcard SPF records: a
domain that publishes an SPF record for *.example.tw would normally also
have that record app
As I tested the all the domains of ccTLD .tw ,included IDN:
553 domains own correct domainkey relative resource records of total 180142
domains
And
715 domains mis-configure them to "v=spf1 ..."
Abel
>
> FYI. [1]
>
> Contact Lars with comments if you've got any.
>
> I believe that his current
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 11:57:43AM -0400, Hector Santos wrote:
> Jeff Macdonald wrote:
> >
>> I also hadn't realized that DKIM was strictly meant to benefit
>> receivers.
>
> Did you really think DKIM will alter the deeply embedded mail filtering
> landscape? :-)
>
Like you at one time said, I w
Jeff Macdonald wrote:
>
I also hadn't realized that DKIM was strictly meant to benefit
receivers.
Did you really think DKIM will alter the deeply embedded mail filtering
landscape? :-)
That is why I always said, the only real true benefit of DKIM is FAILURE
analysis. Receivers will prote
Here's a better example:
d=mattel.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
d=mattel.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
d=mattel.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
d=mattel.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unless there is some reason to think that Barbie has better list
management practices than, say, Felicity Merriman, I suspect that from a
rec
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 11:23:39AM -0400, John L wrote:
d=bigmarketingcompany.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
d=bigmarketingcompany.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> That is an interesting view. I can accomplish the same by using
>> sub-domains in d= instead. Are you simpy going to strip
>>
d=bigmarketingcompany.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
d=bigmarketingcompany.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That is an interesting view. I can accomplish the same by using
sub-domains in d= instead. Are you simpy going to strip
sub-domains from d= too?
Honestly, I'll do whatever seems easiest in my goal to deli
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 03:48:36AM -, John Levine wrote:
> >It would be very useful. Think
> >
> >d=bigmarketingcompany.com
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >d=bigmarketingcompany.com
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Useful to whom? I have little interest as a mail receiver sorting out
> an ESP's different
FYI. [1]
Contact Lars with comments if you've got any.
I believe that his current approach doesn't distinguish
4871 from 4870 domains. If someone could help him do
that, that'd be good IMO.
Cheers,
Stephen.
[1] http://utility.nokia.net/~lars/meter/dkim.html
_
